Login
User name:
Password:
Remember me 
This Month
August 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31
Year Archive
View Article  A QUOTE FOR TODAY FROM PHILIPPE SOLLERS


Une femme qui tolère votre sommeil fait plus que vous aimer, elle vous pardonne d'exister.


(A woman who tolerates your sleeping does more than love you -- she pardons you for existing.)

                                                                              -- Philippe Sollers

[With thanks to Femme Femme Femme for the quote -- image by Cabanel, a Victorian painter famous for his historical and mythological works, which tended to be florid and a bit silly, but whose portraits could be very fine, indeed.]
View Article  GIRLS, THE MOON, THE SEA


Tristan, on his blog the emotional blackmailers handbook, recently posted the above painting by Winslow Homer, Summer Night, which I was happy to be reminded of.  There's something mysterious and wonderful about the image -- two girls dancing together, by the sea, in the light of the moon.  It's not quite erotic, but there are tidal forces at work here which might easily lure a lost mariner to his doom, if he didn't have all his wits about him, crossing the bar.

Check out Tristan's site, which usually contains photographs of lovely, gracious things in and around London.  It's like a visit to a fine old pub, where you can knock back a pint of Guinness in a corner by yourself and mull over visions like the one above . . . at a safe distance.  In that corner, starting on your second pint, you might call to mind,
if you've been wise enough to memorize it, this poem by Tennyson:

Sunset and evening star,
And one clear call for me!
And may there be no moaning of the bar,
When I put out to sea,

But such a tide as moving seems asleep,
Too full for sound and foam,
When that which drew from out the boundless deep
Turns again home.

Twilight and evening bell,
And after that the dark!
And may there be no sadness of farewell,
When I embark;

For though from out our bourne of Time and Place
The flood may bear me far,
I hope to see my Pilot face to face
When I have crossed the bar.
View Article  JULIO ROMERO DE TORRES


This wonderful portrait, Carmen Of Cordova, is by Julio Romero de Torres, a Spanish painter of the late Victorian and early modern eras.  His images are dark, earthy and erotic, with a hint of the perverse.



He started out doing conventional Victorian narrative tableaux, like the one above -- titled Look How Beautiful She Was! -- but eventually developed a more eccentric vision.  Below, a twist on a famous paiting by Velasquez:



Like any respectable Spaniard he both loved and feared women . . .



. . . and also tended to see them in a mystical light:



His sensibility represents an odd blend of the carnal and the spiritual -- always in his work, however sensual, we can hear the Spanish saying "Where the body goes, there goes death."



Above, the artist in his studio with a model and a visitor.  Romero de Torres was born and spent most of his life in Córdoba, taking time out to serve as a pilot in WWI and to visit the Argentine, where he got sick, returning to Córdoba to die at the age of 55.  There are no books in English which collect his work, although twelve more books about the mildly amusing advertising artist Andy Warhol were published last week.

Something is terribly wrong with our civilization -- but you knew that.

There is a museum in Córdoba which lovingly preserves his house and work, which you can visit virtually here.

Thanks, as so often, to Little Hokum Rag and Femme Femme Femme for pointing the way to this enchanting painter.
View Article  A BOUGUEREAU FOR TODAY


Once a poster boy for bourgeois bad taste, Bouguereau is starting to look more and more radical -- certainly more and more bizarre.  The solidity of his angels here is uncanny.  The wings of angels in art are often merely symbolic --
in this image they seem like practical appendages, as necessary to flight as a bird's wings.  They give these angels a monstrous quality, as though they're the product of some unholy genetic experiment.  On the other hand, it may be that the sight of real angels would produce the same impression and that real angels, if photographed, would look exactly as they do above.

For a lengthier meditation on the work of this extraordinary artist, go here:

Bouguereau and the Über-Photograph
View Article  JULES BASTIEN-LEPAGE: A VICTORIAN ARTIST YOU SHOULD KNOW


Jules Bastien-Lepage died tragically young, in 1884, when he was in his late thirties.  He painted one masterpiece, Joan Listening To the Voices (above), which now hangs in the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York.  It's impossible to describe the effect of this large canvas, with its complex and convincing illusion of space, which Joan seems about to step out of, prompted forward by her visions.  It's an example of a photo-realistic technique enlisted in the service of mystical drama.

Bastien-Lepage groped about a bit in his short career, with stylized works of grandiose ambition that seem clumsy and pretentious and modest genre paintings that seem trite, but his über-photographic style could occasionally produce miracles, like this extraordinary portrait of Sarah Bernhardt, which has the quality of a bas-relief:



No other evocation of Bernhardt, in literature, art or photography, brings us as close as Bastien-Lepage's portrait does to the charisma of the great artist.  Nadar's photographs of the young actress humanize her, touch the heart -- Bastien-Lepage's portrait records the determined audacity of her genius.  She seems powerful and vulnerable at the same time, part of the alchemy of a star.

The American sculptor Augustus Saint-Gaudens did a remarkable bas-relief portrait of Bastien-Lepage in bronze, which makes a fine pendant to Bastien-Lepage's portrait of Bernhardt -- both have a tactile grace that takes the breath away, both summon their subjects into our immediate presence, obliterating time and mortality:


View Article  PIERROT'S EMBRACE


Guillaume Seignac was a late Victorian painter (he died in 1924) who mostly turned out undistinguished but sometimes amusing imitations of Bouguereau.  His draftsmanship could be flabby and his images didn't have the über-photographic authority of his master.

The image above is different, though.  It has an odd suggestive power, almost perverse, that's rooted in theatrical gesture.  I find it haunting, for reasons I can't quite put my finger on.
View Article  A GÉRÔME FOR TODAY


Victorian academic painters loved doing scenes set in antique Roman or Oriental baths -- it was a respectable way of showing lots of women in various stages of undress.  The casual, languorous poses of these women would have seemed shocking in a modern setting or unseemly in mythological or allegorical images.  One of the things that was radical about the Impressionists was their depiction of nudity in naturalistic ways, in ordinary settings.  The academics had it both ways -- their settings could say, by implication, "Modern European women don't look or act this way with their clothes off," but everyone knew (or suspected, or hoped) differently.  The hypocrisy added a little spice to the proceedings -- wink, wink . . . nudge, nudge.  It seems a bit silly now, but a bit charming, too.

View Article  A TISSOT FOR TODAY


Tissot loved the Thames and its waterfronts -- which offered him endless opportunities for the sort of spatial drama that he reveled in.  The example above is especially dynamic, with its small boat moving forward into a space in front of the picture plane as the taller ships lead our eye backward into the space of the painting, reinforcing the sense of movement.  The result is a highly cinematic image.

View Article  AN IMAGE FROM THE WAR


Ken Burns says this photograph is his favorite among all the still images used in his documentary The War.  It really is beautiful -- the composition, emphasizing the deep space, reminds one of Victorian academic paintings.  Tissot and Alma-Tadema reveled in compositions like this:


View Article  A ZORN FOR TODAY


Like Renoir, Anders Zorn seemed to be intoxicated by female flesh -- the sensual surface of his canvases seems to be a sexual response to the female nude, whose aura radiates outward to affect her surroundings, which take on her sensual properties, as in the painting above.  The whole world seems made of flesh.  Renoir said, "I paint with my penis," and the same can almost be said of Zorn.



Renoir's world sometimes seems about to melt in the sexual delirium but Zorn kept a stricter control over his draftsmanship and his sense of modeling, of space -- he was more academic in that sense.  The tension between the sensual surface and the precise rendering of forms makes Zorn's work more interesting to me than the late Renoir nudes, which always seem to threaten to dissolve into goo (see above.)  They become more and more about Renoir's mood and process, less and less about real women.
View Article  WINSOR MCCAY AND THE CINEMA


The influence that went on, back and forth, between the cinema and other visual arts has often been noticed but rarely studied in detail.  Writers on cinema have produced tome after tome about the influence of the stage and literature on movies, but the visual side of things has rarely been subjected to rigorous investigation.

Partly this is because the two principal visual influences on movies, comic strips and Victorian academic painting, have had little prestige in the scholarly culture, and partly it's because these two forms have been hard to study themselves.  First-rate reproductions of even the most important comic strips have been difficult to come by, and Victorian academic painting tends to languish in storage in museums, to make room in the galleries for the junk creations of "modern art".

With respect to comic strips, things are changing.  Splendid reproductions of seminal strips like Popeye, Gasoline Alley and Terry and the Pirates are becoming available in ongoing series, and Winsor McCay is getting spectacular treatment in large over-sized volumes which do full justice to his amazing visions. (See here and here.)



New revelations about the connection between comic strips and movies should follow.  Here's a brief slideshow (via Boing Boing) created by a critic at the Boston Globe which surveys some of the most obvious ways Winsor McCay's work has influenced the iconography of movies.  It's based on observations in a new collection of McCay's strip Dream Of the Rarebit Fiend.  More complex issues of narrative technique and composition will surely come to the fore in the future.  [McCay created some of the earliest animated cartoons, so his influence on film animation has long been appreciated, but his influence on movies in general was far more comprehensive, as the slideshow suggests.]

If you want to contemplate the connection between cinema and Victorian academic painting you will just have to settle at present for my passing observations in the essays collected here.
View Article  EMILE FRIANT: A VICTORIAN ARTIST YOU SHOULD KNOW


Émile Friant painted portraits and scenes of the French countryside.  He had, to me, a decidedly cinematic eye -- his genre paintings are not sentimentalized and they have a bold, dynamic quality based on spatial compositions of great though subtle power.  They remind me of Bertolucci's images in 1900.



The painting above uses a technique Tissot was fond of -- creating a space in the foreground that instantly occupies one's attention but which also opens up into a deep space beyond.  Spaces opening up into deeper spaces instantly summon up the idea of movement, of the potential for movement -- they almost produce a sensation of movement.  This and their photorealistic quality are what to me give them a cinematic quality.

Friant was a late Victorian -- he lived until 1932, well into the era of the Impressionist triumph.  Like John Singer Sargent he borrowed a freer approach to brushwork from the Impressionists while remaining true to the basic aesthetic ideals of the Victorian academy.

You can see more of his paintings here, at the Art Renewal Center.
View Article  A BOUGUEREAU FOR TODAY


Bouguereau's figures are so solid that when he sets them floating in the air the effect is unsettling, uncanny, but in a pleasant way, as flying in dreams is pleasant.

View Article  LORD LEIGHTON: A VICTORIAN ARTIST YOU SHOULD KNOW


Lord Leighton was generally considered the dean of Victorian academic painters.  He combined the decorative stylization of the early Pre-Raphaelites with a more photo-realistic draftsmanship, an approach which made his work popular with a wide public and influential among his fellow painters.

The painting above, exhibited in 1855, caused a sensation and established his reputation.  An enormous, 17-foot-long work depicting a procession in Renaissance Italy, it was admired by Queen Victoria, who bought it.  (Click on the image for a larger version.)

Leighton also did works in a style that might be called magical photorealism, like the one below, which reminds one of similar images by Bouguereau:



He could also, like Bouguereau, be frankly sensual in a more naturalistic mode:



Like Alma-Tadema he did vexing evocations of the ancient world:



His historical paintings could have strong narrative and theatrical qualities, like this one, Dante In Exile:



On top of all that he produced some fine portraits, like this famous image of the explorer Sir Richard Burton:



All around, Leighton was really cool.
View Article  A WATERHOUSE FOR TODAY


You could get lost in the spatial complications of this painting, Destiny by John William Waterhouse, which take a while to sort out.  The sorting out is part of the artist's strategy for drawing you into the image -- as the female figure's dream of the adventures those ships could take her on becomes your own.  For her the ships are reflections in a glass, for you they're paint on canvas -- dreaming makes them both real.
View Article  FROM CANVAS TO SCREEN


Here is Anders Zorn at his most academic.  The composition offers a dramatic illusion of deep space, with an optical integrity which evokes the photograph -- but it's all inflected with the suggestion of narrative, as we're invited into the darkened area just off the ballroom where private intercourse is taking place.

And yet for all this we still have Zorn's delightful treatment of the surface of the canvas, with its sensual strokes reminiscent of the Impressionist style, its magical ability to render the subtlest play of light.

The total effect can only be described as cinematic -- and wouldn't it be nice if cinema offered more images as exciting as this one, visually and plastically?

I think it's possible that this image was in the back of D. W. Griffith's mind when he composed the shot below from Intolerance, with its own darkened area just off a ballroom that opens up brightly behind it:



As I've written before, we tend to see early film as a medium emerging from the Victorian stage, but Griffith himself wrote this about Intolerance:

"You will see the world's greatest paintings come to life and move and have their being before your eyes."

The important thing to remember is that painting itself, even before the invention of movies, was aspiring to the condition of cinema.  The spatial depth of Zorn's image, its desire to evoke movement in space, found a kind of fulfillment in the cinema, especially in the cinema of D. W. Griffith.
View Article  JOHN WILLIAM WATERHOUSE: A VICTORIAN ARTIST YOU SHOULD KNOW


Actually, if there's a Victorian artist you do know, it's probably John William Waterhouse.  Prints of his paintings are quite popular, and it's not hard to see why.  He combines the dreamy Romanticism of the Pre-Raphaelites with a bold modeling of forms and an optical integrity that suggests a nearly photographic realism, however free his treatment of the paint surface.



His process seems to have involved a strict linear draftsmanship to which he applied sketchy strokes of paint as he worked out the color scheme of the final image.



He then blended the colors into more modeled forms for the finished work, but retained something of the freshness of his sketches.



Impressionism was a stage in his process, never an end in itself.  His primary goal was narrative suggestiveness and the creation of a world, theatrical as it might be, which convinced the eye with the illusion of space and stereometric forms.  Note the sharp relief of the figures in the painting at the head of this post and the sketchier view of the coast behind them.  The contrast of treatment itself creates a sense of deeper space.

Andrew Lloyd Webber owns the painting below.  I'd have bought it, too, if I had his resources -- it's just miraculous:


View Article  AN ALMA-TADEMA FOR TODAY


The title of this painting is
Unconscious Rivals, implying a narrative content that isn't really apparent in the work itself but suggesting how Alma-Tadema's imagination worked.  He wanted to present the ancient world as brand new, almost photographically convincing in visual terms, and to people it with humans exactly like ourselves, as opposed to classical emblems of virtue or vice.  In this he was following the classical style more closely than some of his neo-classical peers in 19th-Century art.  Even when Greek sculptors in antiquity were depicting mythological beings, they always endowed them with an essential humanity just as vital as their symbolic personae.

The play of light in this painting is magical yet perfectly naturalistic, and I love the way Alma-Tadema has obscured our view of the distant sea, which only makes us look deeper into the space of the painting to register it.  It also makes us imagine walking up to the railing for a better view -- drawing us into the foreground space as we imagine navigating it.

View Article  A TISSOT FOR TODAY


The porch and table with figures creates its own space, echoed in the space of the pier with figures behind it, drawing our eye deeper into the image, to the spars of the docked ship, the buildings and the course of the Thames winding into the distance.

The girl, the captain's daughter of the painting's title, looks in the other direction, counterpointing our attention.  We feel that if we just turned our heads we would see what she's seeing.

We're not simply looking at something -- we're inside the painting . . . we're somewhere.
View Article  ANDERS ZORN


Recently, thanks to Amy Crehore's blog Little Hokum Rag, I discovered the work of the amazing Swedish painter Anders Zorn.  Zorn started his career in the Victorian era and his paintings share some of the attributes of the Victorian academic schools -- an almost photo-realistic style combined with an emphasis on the dramatic use of spatial depth in the image (see above.)

But Zorn worked into the first two decades of the 20th-Century and like Sargent, another quasi-academic, he was attracted to the free brushstrokes and painterly surfaces of the Impressionists.  Indeed, some of Zorn's wonderful  portraits of women can stand favorable comparison with Sargent's work:



Like Gérôme, Zorn's interest in stereometric forms led him to work also in the medium of sculpture:



Zorn was justly celebrated for his images of water, in which the sensual brushstokes render with convincing precision the surfaces of sea or river or lake:



Zorn is perhaps most famous for his plein air nudes.  In them he abandons any hint of the allegorical or classical, which tended to inform the Victorian academic approach to the nude, for a frank celebration of the female body in a natural setting.  I wouldn't be at all surprised if these nudes influenced Andrew Wyeth's portraits of naked women out of doors -- which have the same sort of directness, as though we, the viewers, had simply stumbled upon a woman walking around naked through the woods:



There's a hint of the voyeuristic in the approach -- you get a sense that Zorn's models might be startled (though perhaps not embarrassed) to find someone looking at them.  The image below seems to reflect something of Zorn's attitude -- seen from behind, one of his models appears to be disrobing for him out of doors, or getting dressed again after posing, but Zorn appears to be spying on her without her knowledge.  There's no sense of violation -- just of a secret delight.

I think it's one of the sexiest images in all of art:


View Article  ISLE OF THE DEAD


Above is an amazing image by the 19th-Century Swiss symbolist painter Arnold Böcklin -- Self Portrait With Death.  I stumbled across it while looking for another Böcklin painting, The Isle Of the Dead, which Hitchcock reportedly used as a visual frame of reference for Vertigo.

The Isle Of the Dead (below) is almost as spooky as the self-portrait, and while it's not referenced directly in Vertigo, its mood and basic visual strategy obviously informed a lot of the film's compositions involving Madeleine, the ghostly, morbidly-obsessed heroine, who often appears as a distant, deathly-still figure set against backgrounds of dark trees and the sea.


View Article  SIR LAWRENCE ALMA-TADEMA: A VICTORIAN ARTIST YOU SHOULD KNOW


Sir Lawrence Alma-Tadema might be the most ravishing of all the Victorian academic painters.  His luminous photo-authoritative images of the ancient world are sensually and historically seductive -- they seem to lay antiquity before us as it might have appeared in real life were we to be magically transported back into it.

In truth his visions are romantic, concentrating as they do on sunny Mediterranean light, color, luxury and spectacle -- but they convince the eye.  His preoccupation with the illusion of spatial depth draws us imaginatively into the scenes he conjures up, gives us a visceral sense of participation in them.


The tradition of the Biblical epic in cinema pursued Alma-Tadema's aims by other means but rarely achieved them with such magnificent authority.  The chariot race in Wyler's Ben-Hur perhaps comes closest to involving us in a vision of the ancient world that possesses a comparable enchantment and illusion of truth.


Wyler, and second-unit director Yakima Canutt, who actually supervised most of the filming of the chariot race, used the tracking shot in spectacular ways to draw us into the cinematic universe of the sequence.  A camera moving through real spaces, photographing real people driving real chariots was a powerful tool, but in a way its very power highlights the effects Alma-Tadema was able to achieve with just paint and canvas.

He was fine painter, as well as a fine storyteller -- the study below gives a good idea of his purely painterly gifts, scarcely inferior to Degas', for example:


The 20th-Century art establishment became suspicious of the meticulous "finish" the academic painters gave their works, but the über-photographic illusion they were after, and the narrative ambitions it served, remain potent and charming.


View Article  A GEROME FOR TODAY


One of the artist's popular desert scenes.  It's hard to imagine that David Lean, or his cinematographer Freddie Young, didn't study these when preparing to shoot Lawrence Of Arabia, which is like a series of
Gérômes come to life.
View Article  VICTORIAN ART AND THE CINEMA


In the mythology of modern art history the realist painters of the Victorian era fought a losing battle with the photograph and eventually capitulated to the dominant aesthetic of 20th-Century art, with its irresistible (and progressive) trend towards a greater and greater abstraction, abandoning both pictorial realism and almost all narrative ambitions.


In fact, however, realist painters of the Victoria era conducted an exciting and productive dialogue with the photograph, incorporating its apparent authority but also, at the same time, extending its range of representation beyond the technical limits of the 19th-Century camera.



Academic art surrendered not to the abstractions of the 20th-Century painter but to the great artists of the early cinema, who assumed the narrative and representational ambitions of academic art in a medium which had, at least as far a popular taste went, better resources for realizing those ambitions.  You could almost say that the academic art of the 19th-Century was born again, gloriously, in a new medium, which it deeply influenced.



Academic art taught movies how to orchestrate photo-realistic elements into theatrical forms, using lighting, framing and the placement of figures in space to create a hyper-realistic illusion that had the coherence of actual visual experience even when departing from it in fabulous ways.  Because film could capture motion, and thus emphasize the plasticity of space far more expressively than the easel-painter, it rendered the academic easel-painter's art passé.  It was motion and the greater illusion of spatial depth it allowed which lost academic art its popular following.



But much more than that was lost, especially in the realm of color.  Up until very recent times, color film stocks couldn't begin to reproduce the range of lighting conditions which the Victorian realist painters gloried in.  By marrying, through draftsmanship, an almost photographic realism with an über-photographic sensitivity to color and light, the Victorian painters anticipated cinematic effects which remain difficult to achieve even today.

The attempt to devalue the work of Victorian painters, seeing them as obstinate blocks to the steady progress of art, was a strategic ploy on the part of 20th-Century modernist painters and their apologists in the academy and the marketplace.  Engaged in a project which would divorce art from popular taste and arrive at an aesthetic dead end before the end of the 20th century, they posited a straw man in the person of the reactionary academic practitioner which lent their own schools an undeserved glamor and prestige -- even as the academic practitioner was informing and inspiring the great new popular art form of the movies.

But the intellectual disgrace of the Victorian painters also helped impoverish cinema, because, after the first glorious blossoming of the art in the silent era, filmmakers forgot academic painting.  To get back in touch with its lessons, they had to get back in touch with the masters of the silent era, like Griffith, Vidor, Murnau and Ford, for whom Victorian academic painting was a living form and a direct inspiration of their techniques.  The filmmakers who followed them had to engage Victorian academic art at one remove, and thus lost touch with the very forms which had inspired and instructed the original pioneers of cinema.



The propaganda of the modernist painters, understandable from their point of view, resulted in a great loss to the visual culture of the 20th-Century.  It couldn't obliterate the glories of Victorian academic painting, which survived, transformed, in movies and in popular illustration (through the work of artists like N. C. Wyeth and Norman Rockwell.)  But it distorted the intellectual appreciation of a visual tradition which might have been of great use to artists, film artists especially, if they hadn't been shamed into despising it on principle.



I would argue that a new appreciation of Victorian realist painting has the power to recharge the art of cinema in our time -- quite apart from the pleasures to be gained by directly encountering a vital and ravishing visual tradition.


View Article  A TISSOT FOR TODAY


Ces Dames de Chars.  Notice how the lead horse gallops into an imaginary space in front of the canvas, while the eye is simultaneously drawn in the opposite direction, through a series of distinct interior spaces within the image -- the bright covered arena, the darkened audience galleries -- that open up behind the lady charioteers.

To read more about Tissot go here.
View Article  NORMAN ROCKWELL


Norman Rockwell was not the least of the Victorian academic painters, even though he lived in the 20th-Century.  He perfected the photo-authoritative aesthetic of the late Victorians and used it for complex narrative purposes.  The official Victorian academy was swept away as a fountainhead of popular art by the invention of movies, but Rockwell competed with movies directly and survived.  Indeed, he triumphed.  His images seem like stills from imaginary movies -- movies more wonderful and moving and entertaining than even Hollywood could turn out.



I can't imagine that any filmmaker from Hollywood's so-called golden age, the studio era, wasn't influenced on some level by Rockwell's art.  Steven Spielberg, a connoisseur and student of that golden age, has an original Rockwell hanging behind the desk in his office.

Many modernist painters will admit to admiring Rockwell, but
the 20th-Century art establishment in general  marginalized and even stigmatized his work for the crime of being popular in the mainstream culture -- not just noticed and known but intensely loved -- and for embracing a tradition linked to the achievement of the discredited Victorians.

Anyone with eyes can see what nonsense that was.


View Article  JEAN-LEON GEROME: A VICTORIAN PAINTER YOU SHOULD KNOW


The spooky, wonderful image above, Duel After A Masked Ball, was painted by Jean-Léon Gérôme, one of the great masters of Victorian academic art.  To me, his work aspires to the condition of cinema and can be studied in that regard with great profit.  I think one finds in it, both formally and in terms of subject matter, the reflection of many concerns that would help shape the emerging art of movies.

Gérôme used a photo-authoritative style to make his visions of Oriental scenes and his recreations of historical periods alive and true to viewers who were beginning to process the visual world more and more through the medium of photography.  He was concerned with narrative images and used the illusion of depth to draw the viewer into those images -- the drama of space obsessed him.  He was so concerned with stereometric forms that he also worked regularly as a sculptor.


Though he died in 1904, before movies came into their own as a plastic and narrative medium, he would have thrilled, I think, at their capacity to carry his aesthetic methods into new realms and elaborate them fantastically.

Gérôme's Technicolor über-photographs can seem like frame-grabs from imaginary movies.  You can see the compositional style of Lawrence Of Arabia (and John Ford) in his desert scenes . . .


. . . foreshadowings of Intolerance in his 18th-Century tableaux . . .


. . . the epic visions of De Mille in his Biblical scenes . . .


Griffith, De Mille and Ford would have been familiar with Gérôme directly -- his work was wildly popular and widely reproduced in the time of their youth.  Lean may have echoed Gérôme simply by sharing his formal concerns, though it wouldn't surprise me at all if Lean knew and admired his paintings.  In any case, the profound connection between Victorian academic art and the cinema is nowhere more evident than in the work of this great painter.

To me, the image below of Pygmalion's sculpture Galatea coming to life can serve as a metaphor for the advent of movies, when the aesthetic aspirations of the Victorian academic painter came into fuller life through motion itself.


View Article  BOUGUEREAU AND THE UBER-PHOTOGRAPH



One objection commonly made to Victorian academic art is that it's too "photographic" -- that it tried for a kind of photorealism which the camera had made redundant.


I think this objection is misguided on two counts.  The first is that the "photorealism" of the Victorian academics far exceeded the capacities of the 19th-Century camera.  The academic painter could achieve color effects which film stocks wouldn't be able to record until late in the 20th Century.  The Victorian academics could also capture motion in ways the still camera could not until the early 20th-Century, with the advent of faster film stocks and shutter speeds.  The Victorian realist painter was in fact developing his aesthetic in precisely those areas where the cameras of the time were deficient.

More importantly, photorealism is not an aesthetic fault.  Painters since the Renaissance have often striven for hyper-realistic effects, and have sometimes used proto-photographic technologies, like the camera obscura, to that end.  The fact that Van Eyck and Vermeer might possibly have used the camera obscura as an aid in draftsmanship is surely not in itself a fault in their methods.  And many artists now seen as post-academic, like Degas, used the camera itself as an aid to composition, and the photorealistic aspect of their work constitutes a strong element of its appeal.

The Victorian academic painter, however, was doing something new in the wake of the invention and widespread popularity of photography -- he was conducting a conscious dialogue with the camera.  He was incorporating a new standard of visual authority introduced by the camera, and doing it on purpose.  He knew that the experience of viewing photographs had introduced a new relationship to visual reality in the mind of modern man.  The Victorian realist painter didn't try to ape the photograph, and he could exceed its resources in many areas, but he always paid homage to its authority -- and he tried to construct a new visual aesthetic based on that authority.



His effort in that regard was the basis for the magic of Victorian academic art, for it popularity at the time and for its enduring appeal.  Apologists for the Victorian painters often try to downplay this aspect of the academic style, try to reconnect them to the art that had gone before them in an unbroken tradition.  But they were radical -- the photograph made them radical.



So Bouguereau wanted to show us nymphs and satyrs, wanted to show us figures floating in mid air, but wanted us to receive the visions as having the authority of photographs -- and not just the photographs that an actual camera of the time could make but ideal photographs, recording the subtlest effects of light, capturing the most fleeting nuances of gesture.  He wanted to make us feel that we were looking at an über-photograph.  (Bouguereau's fantastical work is the best place to start in a study of the über-photographic aesthetic, because, unlike much Victorian academic art, it takes as its subjects things which could not be observed or staged in real life and thus could not be photographed.  It's therefore doing something far more complex than imitating contemporary photographic practice.  If we can locate the über-photographic aesthetic here, we can isolate it as a purely conceptual strategy.)



And so one has the utter strangeness of Bouguereau -- decidedly corporeal figures hovering above the ground, mythological figures with the sex appeal of naughty photographic postcards, because they seem to represent actual naked men and women with unimpeachable authority.  Some people find Bouguereau's nudes pornographic, and on one level they are.  Bouguereau has used his virtuosic technique to portray these naked men and women as though they were real people recorded by a camera, not visions transmitted through an artistic sensibility.  They have that hint of indecency, of violation, that always attaches in some measure to photographs of naked people.

This not something to object to -- it's what makes Bouguereau cool, exciting, new, radical.  It's why his paintings are still alive for people today, objects that rivet the attention, whatever judgment the mind may be passing on them as works of art.  How much more complicated, courageous, inventive, witty was Bouguereau's response to the photograph than that of the modernist rebels who simply walked away from it, turned to abstraction in defiance of the photograph's power.

That power has not diminished over time -- indeed much of our conception of the world we live in today is determined, overdetermined, by the photograph.  Which is why on some level Bouguereau speaks to us more deeply than the abstractionists do.  Bouguereau draws us into that same dialogue with the photograph that he himself conducted, and in transcending its power -- by seeming to carry it farther than it can ever actually go, even in the age of Photoshop -- he places it in a truer perspective than the modernists could ever have conceived.

A distinguished museum director has observed how difficult it is to hang Bouguereau in a modern museum -- discerning a disconnect not only between Bouguereau and 20th-Century modernism but also between Bouguereau and the great high-art tradition his work seems to inhabit.  That is precisely because Bouguereau's work strove for a transcendent synthesis of painting and photography -- something no art before him could have done and no institutionally-sanctioned art after him has chosen to do.  His work is thus profoundly modern, more genuinely modern in some ways than the work of the 20th-Century abstractionists.  It may be, in fact, that Bouguereau is so modern, so radical, that for some time to come he will need a room all to himself.

[I think the concept of the über-photograph is a useful way of distinguishing the style of the early pre-Raphaelites from the mainstream of Victorian academic art that emerged after them.  Rossetti had a fundamentally painterly aesthetic with a strong bent towards the stylized and decorative, a bent developed most conspicuously in the work of William Morris.  The academic painters of the second half of the 19th-Century departed from both in adopting a photo-authoritative strategy, however fanciful their subjects.  Burne-Jones was a key transitional figure in this process.  Though he held onto many of the painterly and decorative elements of Rossetti's style one begins to see in his work a shift towards the photo-realistic -- mainly in his strict stereometric modeling of forms and figures, which gave his paintings a sculptural quality.  It was the quality of relief-sculpture, however -- he rarely pursued the bold evocations of deep space that so preoccupied Alma-Tadema, Lord Leighton, Tissot and Waterhouse, to take a few examples.  Their strategies with regard to spatial illusion were closely connected to the über-photographic aesthetic.  By the same token, the idea of the über-photograph can be used to distinguish the project of Victorian academic painters from the sterile photo-realism of some modern painters, who are consciously evoking and aping the photograph and not trying to transcend its limitations, not trying for a new visual synthesis.]




The images above come from a remarkable web site -- that of the Art Renewal Center, an organization dedicated with almost evangelical zeal to the rehabilitation of Victorian academic art.  They have online galleries with thousands of examples of the form -- wandering through them is a magical (and mind-expanding) experience.
View Article  JAMES TISSOT: A VICTORIAN ARTIST YOU SHOULD KNOW


James Tissot was known for two things -- his immensely popular Bible illustrations and his paintings of contemporary Victorian society.


My friend Paul Zahl says that the Bible illustrations influenced the iconography of the early Hollywood Biblical epics, and he may be right, but I'm not a big fan of these works, aesthetically speaking.  They're drawn in a looser, more impressionistic and decorative style than his easel paintings, and to me don't have the same power.

The easel paintings strike me as downright stunning.  In them the use of an almost photographic draftsmanship and sometimes subtle but always highly dramatic evocations of spatial depth result in works that utterly enchant me.



Tissot had a number of compositional strategies for producing an impression of spatial depth.  The most characteristic was the depiction of semi-enclosed spaces with portals onto wider spaces beyond, which cause the eye to come to rest momentarily in the foreground space and then to explore the background space, which reveals itself almost as a surprise, a release.

Tissot also had a knack for compositions involving larger groups in a public space, like a ballroom, in which the empty areas of the scene suggest the potential for action within it.  The strategy is very explicit in the painting below, Too Early, in which the future of the evening unfolds like a ghostly vision around the few early arrivals waiting for the festivities to begin.



This is a perfect example of how visual space can be charged with emotion -- we populate the half-empty ballroom with future dancing, just as the early arrivals do . . . we enter into the emotional anticipation of these folks who've arrived a little too soon.



Tissot's genius at suggesting depth through composition and modeling also allowed him to produce canvases which shimmer with surface colors, like the canvases of the Impressionists, but almost simultaneously draw our imaginations irresistibly into the space depicted -- something the Impressionists were rarely concerned to do.  The effect is magical, and one that movies would soon learn to achieve in more spectacular ways than the academic Victorian painters had at their command.  Their most potent charm was appropriated, and their school of painting faded into history.

But when we look at Tissot's paintings today, when our imaginations are drawn into the spaces of his world, we can achieve a remarkable sense of intimacy with the Victorian society he observed, we can share the concerns and sometimes even the emotions of its long-vanished inhabitants . . . and there's an enchantment in that which will never fade.


View Article  VICTORIAN ACADEMIC PAINTING


Faced with the invention of photography, academic painters of the Victorian era (like James Tissot above and Jules Lefebvre below) at first tried to compete with the new technology on its own terms -- by creating super-realistic images that had the advantage of being in color and could convey a more convincing suggestion of narrative or of the flux of ordinary life.  Posed photographs tended to look posed, largely because long exposure times required subjects to stay frozen in fixed positions for many seconds at a time.  The academic painter could achieve effects with his figures that seemed in some ways, paradoxically, more naturalistic, more lifelike than anything the 19th-Century camera could capture.  These effects constituted the realist painter's only areas of advantage over the "scientific" authority of the photographic record.



The Victorian academic painters concentrated on producing an illusion of depth in the image (again competing in this with the photograph and especially the stereoscopic photograph) and located their expressiveness in the drama of space itself, drawing the eye into the painting as a prelude to seducing the mind into the emotional content of the scene depicted, as in the painting below by John William Waterhouse:



They were enormously successful in this, across a wide range of genres -- from historical tableaux to contemporary social observations.  The Impressionist school which challenged the academic style tended to downplay spatial drama and bring the surface texture of the painting itself, and the sheer drama of color, into prominence.  The Impressionists generally abandoned historical subjects and concentrated on contemporary scenes.  There were some painters who almost straddled the two schools, like John Singer Sargent and Gustave Caillebotte -- but to me these two painters remained primarily in the academic camp, because a precise, stereometric modeling of forms and an insistence on the drama of space tended to loom larger in their work than either the free treatment of paint on canvas or the pure celebration of color as an end in itself.

Caillebotte hung out (and hung his work) with the Impressionists but his best paintings, like the scene below, are almost categorically academic:



Sargent, though he made his living primarily by painting portraits of the sort of people who favored academic art, was enchanted by the Impressionists' free use of paint, but even at his most unruly in this regard he remained at heart captivated by the drama of space and solid forms, which can be seen in this exquisite interior whose subtly dramatic framing draws our eye past the surface of the canvas into the room depicted:



The i