This Month
| August 2008 |
| Sun |
Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thu |
Fri |
Sat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
Friday, August 15

A QUOTE FOR TODAY FROM PHILIPPE SOLLERS
by
Lloydville
on Fri 15 Aug 2008 01:26 PM PDT

Une femme qui tolère votre sommeil fait plus que vous aimer, elle vous pardonne d'exister.
(A woman who tolerates your sleeping does more than love you -- she pardons you for existing.)
-- Philippe Sollers
[With thanks to Femme Femme Femme for the quote -- image by Cabanel, a Victorian painter famous for his historical and mythological works, which tended to be florid and a bit silly, but whose portraits could be very fine, indeed.]
Thursday, July 24

GIRLS, THE MOON, THE SEA
by
Lloydville
on Thu 24 Jul 2008 11:52 PM PDT

Tristan, on his blog the emotional blackmailers handbook, recently posted the above painting by Winslow Homer, Summer Night, which I was happy to be reminded of. There's something mysterious and wonderful about the image -- two girls dancing together, by the sea, in the light of the moon. It's not quite erotic, but there are tidal forces at work here which might easily lure a lost mariner to his doom, if he didn't have all his wits about him, crossing the bar.
Check out Tristan's site, which usually contains photographs of lovely, gracious things in and around London. It's like a visit to a fine old pub, where you can knock back a pint of Guinness in a corner by yourself and mull over visions like the one above . . . at a safe distance. In that corner, starting on your second pint, you might call to mind, if you've been wise enough to memorize it, this poem by Tennyson:
Sunset and evening star,
And one clear call for me!
And may there be no moaning of the bar,
When I put out to sea,
But such a tide as moving seems asleep,
Too full for sound and foam,
When that which drew from out the boundless deep
Turns again home.
Twilight and evening bell,
And after that the dark!
And may there be no sadness of farewell,
When I embark;
For though from out our bourne of Time and Place
The flood may bear me far,
I hope to see my Pilot face to face
When I have crossed the bar.
Wednesday, April 30

JULIO ROMERO DE TORRES
by
Lloydville
on Wed 30 Apr 2008 02:58 AM PDT

This wonderful portrait, Carmen Of Cordova,
is by Julio Romero de Torres, a Spanish painter of the late Victorian
and early modern eras. His images are dark, earthy and
erotic, with a hint of the perverse.

He started out doing conventional Victorian narrative tableaux, like the one above -- titled Look How Beautiful She Was! -- but eventually developed a more eccentric vision. Below, a twist on a famous paiting by Velasquez:

Like any respectable Spaniard he both loved and feared women . . .

. . . and also tended to see them in a mystical light:

His sensibility represents an odd blend of the carnal and the spiritual
-- always in his work, however sensual, we can hear the Spanish saying
"Where the body goes, there goes death."

Above, the artist in his studio with a model and a visitor.
Romero de Torres was born and spent most of his life in Córdoba, taking
time out to serve as a pilot in WWI and to visit the Argentine, where
he got sick, returning to Córdoba to die at the age of 55. There
are no books in English which collect his work, although twelve more
books about the mildly amusing advertising artist Andy Warhol were
published last week.
Something is terribly wrong with our civilization -- but you knew that.
There is a museum in Córdoba which lovingly preserves his house and work, which you can visit virtually here.
Thanks, as so often, to Little Hokum Rag and Femme Femme Femme for pointing the way to this enchanting painter.
Tuesday, April 8

A BOUGUEREAU FOR TODAY
by
Lloydville
on Tue 08 Apr 2008 08:00 AM PDT

Once a poster boy for bourgeois bad taste, Bouguereau is starting to
look more and more radical -- certainly more and more bizarre.
The solidity of his angels here is uncanny. The wings of angels
in art are often merely symbolic -- in this image they
seem like practical appendages, as necessary to flight as a bird's
wings. They give these angels a monstrous quality, as though
they're the product of some unholy genetic experiment. On the
other hand, it may be that the sight of real angels would produce the
same impression and that real angels, if photographed, would look exactly as
they do above.
For a lengthier meditation on the work of this extraordinary artist, go here:
Bouguereau and the Über-Photograph
Wednesday, April 2

JULES BASTIEN-LEPAGE: A VICTORIAN ARTIST YOU SHOULD KNOW
by
Lloydville
on Wed 02 Apr 2008 02:48 AM PDT

Jules Bastien-Lepage died tragically young, in 1884, when he was in his late thirties. He painted one masterpiece, Joan Listening To the Voices (above),
which now hangs in the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York.
It's impossible to describe the effect of this large canvas, with its
complex and convincing illusion of space, which Joan seems about to step out of,
prompted forward by her visions. It's an example of a
photo-realistic technique enlisted in the service of mystical drama.
Bastien-Lepage groped about a bit in his short career, with stylized
works of grandiose ambition that seem clumsy and pretentious and
modest genre paintings that seem trite, but his über-photographic style
could occasionally produce miracles, like this extraordinary portrait of Sarah Bernhardt,
which has the quality of a bas-relief:

No other evocation of Bernhardt, in literature, art or photography,
brings us as close as Bastien-Lepage's portrait does to the charisma of
the great artist. Nadar's photographs of the young actress
humanize her, touch the heart -- Bastien-Lepage's portrait records the
determined audacity of her genius. She seems powerful and
vulnerable at the same time, part of the alchemy of a star.
The American sculptor Augustus Saint-Gaudens did a remarkable
bas-relief portrait of Bastien-Lepage in bronze, which makes a fine
pendant to Bastien-Lepage's portrait of Bernhardt -- both have a
tactile grace that takes the breath away, both summon their subjects into
our immediate presence, obliterating time and mortality:

Thursday, February 21

PIERROT'S EMBRACE
by
Lloydville
on Thu 21 Feb 2008 08:23 PM PST

Guillaume Seignac
was a late Victorian painter (he died in 1924) who mostly turned out
undistinguished but sometimes amusing imitations of Bouguereau.
His draftsmanship could be flabby and his images didn't have the
über-photographic authority of his master.
The image above is different, though. It has an odd suggestive
power, almost perverse, that's rooted in theatrical gesture. I
find it haunting, for reasons I can't quite put my finger on.
Wednesday, December 5

A GÉRÔME FOR TODAY
by
Lloydville
on Wed 05 Dec 2007 07:31 AM PST

Victorian academic painters loved doing scenes set in antique Roman or
Oriental baths -- it was a respectable way of showing lots of women in
various stages of undress. The casual, languorous poses of these
women would have seemed shocking in a modern setting or unseemly in
mythological or allegorical images. One of the things that was
radical about the Impressionists was their depiction of nudity in
naturalistic ways, in ordinary settings. The academics had it both
ways -- their settings could say, by implication, "Modern European
women don't look or act this way with their clothes off," but everyone
knew (or suspected, or hoped) differently. The hypocrisy added a little spice to the
proceedings -- wink, wink . . . nudge, nudge. It seems a bit
silly now, but a bit charming, too.
Monday, November 26

A TISSOT FOR TODAY
by
Lloydville
on Mon 26 Nov 2007 11:22 AM PST

Tissot loved the Thames and its waterfronts -- which offered him
endless opportunities for the sort of spatial drama that he reveled
in. The example above is especially dynamic, with its small boat
moving forward into a space in front of the picture plane as the
taller ships lead our eye backward into the space of the painting, reinforcing the sense of
movement. The result is a highly cinematic image.
Saturday, November 17

AN IMAGE FROM THE WAR
by
Lloydville
on Sat 17 Nov 2007 12:33 AM PST
Ken Burns says this photograph is his favorite among all the still images used in his documentary The War.
It really is beautiful -- the composition, emphasizing the deep space,
reminds one of Victorian academic paintings. Tissot and
Alma-Tadema reveled in compositions like this:

Thursday, November 15

A ZORN FOR TODAY
by
Lloydville
on Thu 15 Nov 2007 12:21 PM PST

Like Renoir, Anders Zorn seemed to be intoxicated by female flesh --
the sensual surface of his canvases seems to be a sexual response to
the female nude, whose aura radiates outward to affect her
surroundings, which take on her sensual properties, as in the painting above. The whole
world seems made of flesh. Renoir said, "I paint with my penis,"
and the same can almost be said of Zorn.

Renoir's world sometimes seems about to melt in the sexual delirium but
Zorn
kept a stricter control over his draftsmanship and his sense of
modeling, of space -- he was more academic in that sense. The
tension between the sensual surface and the precise rendering of forms
makes Zorn's work more interesting to me than the late Renoir nudes,
which always seem to threaten to dissolve into goo (see above.)
They become
more and more about Renoir's mood and process, less and less about real
women.
Wednesday, November 14

WINSOR MCCAY AND THE CINEMA
by
Lloydville
on Wed 14 Nov 2007 11:05 AM PST

The
influence that went on, back and forth, between the cinema and other
visual arts has often been noticed but rarely studied in detail.
Writers on cinema have produced tome after tome about the influence of the
stage and literature on movies, but the visual side of things has
rarely been subjected to rigorous investigation.
Partly this is because the two principal visual influences on movies,
comic strips and Victorian academic painting, have had little prestige
in the scholarly culture, and partly it's because these two forms have
been hard to study themselves. First-rate reproductions of even
the most important comic strips have been difficult to come by, and
Victorian academic painting tends to languish in storage in museums, to
make room in the galleries for the junk creations of "modern art".
With respect to comic strips, things are changing. Splendid reproductions of seminal strips like Popeye, Gasoline Alley and Terry and the Pirates
are becoming available in ongoing series, and Winsor McCay is getting
spectacular treatment in large over-sized volumes which do full justice
to his amazing visions. (See here and here.)

New revelations about the connection between comic strips and movies should
follow. Here's a brief slideshow (via Boing Boing) created by a critic at the Boston Globe
which surveys some of the most obvious ways Winsor McCay's work has
influenced the iconography of movies. It's based on observations in a new collection of McCay's strip Dream Of the Rarebit Fiend. More complex issues of
narrative technique and composition will surely come to the fore in the
future. [McCay created some of the earliest animated cartoons, so
his influence on film animation has long been appreciated, but his
influence on movies in general was far more comprehensive, as the
slideshow suggests.]
If you want to contemplate the connection between cinema and Victorian
academic painting you will just have to settle at present for my
passing observations in the essays collected here.
Friday, October 19

EMILE FRIANT: A VICTORIAN ARTIST YOU SHOULD KNOW
by
Lloydville
on Fri 19 Oct 2007 08:34 AM PDT

Émile
Friant painted portraits and scenes of the French countryside. He
had, to me, a decidedly cinematic eye -- his genre paintings are not
sentimentalized and they have a bold, dynamic quality based on spatial
compositions of great though subtle power. They remind me of Bertolucci's
images in 1900.

The painting above uses a technique Tissot was fond of -- creating a
space in the foreground that instantly occupies one's attention but
which also opens up into a deep space beyond. Spaces opening up
into deeper spaces instantly summon up the idea of movement, of the
potential for movement -- they almost produce a sensation of movement. This
and their photorealistic quality are what to me give them a cinematic
quality.
Friant was a late Victorian -- he lived until 1932, well into the era
of the Impressionist triumph. Like John Singer Sargent he
borrowed a freer approach to brushwork from the Impressionists while
remaining true to the basic aesthetic ideals of the Victorian academy.
You can see more of his paintings here, at the Art Renewal Center.
Monday, July 2

A BOUGUEREAU FOR TODAY
by
Lloydville
on Mon 02 Jul 2007 09:52 AM PDT

Bouguereau's figures are so solid that when he sets them floating in
the air the effect is unsettling, uncanny, but in a pleasant way, as
flying in dreams is pleasant.
Wednesday, June 27

LORD LEIGHTON: A VICTORIAN ARTIST YOU SHOULD KNOW
by
Lloydville
on Wed 27 Jun 2007 11:07 AM PDT

Lord Leighton
was generally considered the dean of Victorian academic painters.
He combined the decorative stylization of the early Pre-Raphaelites
with a more photo-realistic draftsmanship, an approach which made his
work popular with a wide public and influential among his fellow
painters.
The painting above, exhibited in 1855, caused a sensation and
established his reputation. An enormous, 17-foot-long work
depicting a procession in Renaissance Italy, it was admired by Queen
Victoria, who bought it. (Click on the image for a larger
version.)
Leighton also did works in a style that might be called magical
photorealism, like the one below, which reminds one of similar images
by Bouguereau:

He could also, like Bouguereau, be frankly sensual in a more naturalistic mode:

Like Alma-Tadema he did vexing evocations of the ancient world:

His historical paintings could have strong narrative and theatrical qualities, like this one, Dante In Exile:

On top of all that he produced some fine portraits, like this famous image of the explorer Sir Richard Burton:

All around, Leighton was really cool.
Saturday, June 9

A WATERHOUSE FOR TODAY
by
Lloydville
on Sat 09 Jun 2007 12:25 AM PDT

You could get lost in the spatial complications of this painting, Destiny
by John William Waterhouse, which take a while to sort out. The
sorting out is part of the artist's strategy for drawing you into the
image -- as the female figure's dream of the adventures those ships
could take her on becomes your own. For her the ships are reflections
in a glass, for you they're paint on canvas -- dreaming makes them both
real.
Friday, June 1

FROM CANVAS TO SCREEN
by
Lloydville
on Fri 01 Jun 2007 12:15 AM PDT

Here
is Anders Zorn at his most academic. The composition offers a
dramatic illusion of deep space, with an optical integrity which evokes
the photograph -- but it's all inflected with the suggestion of
narrative, as we're invited into the darkened area just off the
ballroom where private intercourse is taking place.
And yet for all this we still have Zorn's delightful treatment of the
surface of the canvas, with its sensual strokes reminiscent of the
Impressionist style, its magical ability to render the subtlest play of light.
The total effect can only be described as cinematic -- and wouldn't it
be nice if cinema offered more images as exciting as this one, visually
and plastically?
I think it's possible that this image was in the back of D. W. Griffith's mind when he composed the shot below from Intolerance, with its own darkened area just off a ballroom that opens up brightly behind it:

As I've written before, we tend to see early film as a medium emerging
from the Victorian stage, but Griffith himself wrote this about Intolerance:
"You will see the world's greatest paintings come to life and move and have their being before your eyes."
The important thing to remember is that painting itself, even before
the invention of movies, was aspiring to the condition of cinema.
The spatial depth of Zorn's image, its desire to evoke movement in
space, found a kind of fulfillment in the cinema, especially in the
cinema of D. W. Griffith.
Sunday, May 6

JOHN WILLIAM WATERHOUSE: A VICTORIAN ARTIST YOU SHOULD KNOW
by
Lloydville
on Sun 06 May 2007 01:56 AM PDT

Actually, if there's a Victorian artist you do
know, it's probably John William Waterhouse. Prints of his
paintings are quite popular, and it's not hard to see why. He
combines the dreamy Romanticism of the Pre-Raphaelites with a bold
modeling of forms and an optical integrity that suggests a nearly
photographic realism, however free his treatment of the paint surface.

His process seems to have involved a strict linear draftsmanship to
which he applied sketchy strokes of paint as he worked out the color
scheme of the final image.

He then blended the colors into more modeled forms for the finished
work, but retained something of the freshness of his sketches.

Impressionism was a stage in his process, never an end in itself.
His primary goal was narrative suggestiveness and the creation of a
world, theatrical as it might be, which convinced the eye with the
illusion of space and stereometric forms. Note the sharp relief
of the figures in the painting at the head of this post and the
sketchier view of the coast behind them. The contrast of
treatment itself creates a sense of deeper space.
Andrew Lloyd Webber owns the painting below. I'd have bought it, too, if I had his resources -- it's just miraculous:

Sunday, April 29

AN ALMA-TADEMA FOR TODAY
by
Lloydville
on Sun 29 Apr 2007 12:18 AM PDT

The title of this painting is Unconscious Rivals,
implying a narrative content that isn't really apparent in the work
itself but suggesting how Alma-Tadema's imagination worked. He
wanted to present the ancient world as brand new, almost
photographically convincing in visual terms, and to people it with
humans exactly like ourselves, as opposed to classical emblems of
virtue or vice. In this he was following the classical style more
closely than some of his neo-classical peers in 19th-Century art.
Even when Greek sculptors in antiquity were depicting mythological
beings, they always endowed them with an essential humanity just as
vital as their symbolic personae.
The play of
light in this painting is magical yet perfectly naturalistic, and I
love the way Alma-Tadema has obscured our view of the distant sea,
which only makes us look deeper into the space of the painting to
register it. It also makes us imagine walking up to the railing
for a better view -- drawing us into the foreground space as we imagine
navigating it.
Thursday, April 26

A TISSOT FOR TODAY
by
Lloydville
on Thu 26 Apr 2007 07:39 AM PDT
The
porch and table with figures creates its own space, echoed in the space
of the pier with figures behind it, drawing our eye deeper into the
image, to the spars of the docked ship, the buildings and the course of
the Thames winding into the distance.
The girl, the captain's daughter of the painting's title, looks in the
other direction, counterpointing our attention. We feel that if
we just turned our heads we would see what she's seeing.
We're not simply looking at something -- we're inside the painting . . . we're somewhere.
Monday, April 23

ANDERS ZORN
by
Lloydville
on Mon 23 Apr 2007 08:28 AM PDT

Recently,
thanks to Amy Crehore's blog Little Hokum Rag, I discovered the work of
the amazing Swedish painter Anders Zorn. Zorn started his career
in the Victorian era and his paintings share some of the attributes of
the Victorian academic schools -- an almost photo-realistic style
combined with an emphasis on the dramatic use of spatial depth in the
image (see above.)
But Zorn worked into the first two decades of the 20th-Century and like
Sargent, another quasi-academic, he was attracted to the free
brushstrokes and painterly surfaces of the Impressionists.
Indeed, some of Zorn's wonderful portraits of women can stand
favorable comparison with Sargent's work:

Like Gérôme, Zorn's interest in stereometric forms led him to work also in the medium of sculpture:

Zorn was justly celebrated for his images of water, in which the sensual
brushstokes render with convincing precision the surfaces of sea or river or lake:

Zorn is perhaps most famous for his plein air
nudes. In them he abandons any hint of the allegorical or
classical, which tended to inform the Victorian academic approach to
the nude, for a frank celebration of the female body in a natural
setting. I wouldn't be at all surprised if these nudes influenced
Andrew Wyeth's portraits of naked women out of doors -- which have the
same sort of directness, as though we, the viewers, had simply stumbled
upon a woman walking around naked through the woods:

There's a hint of the voyeuristic in the approach -- you get a sense
that Zorn's models might be startled (though perhaps not embarrassed)
to find someone looking at them. The image below seems to reflect something of
Zorn's attitude -- seen from behind, one of his models appears to be
disrobing for him out of doors, or getting dressed again after posing, but Zorn appears to be spying on her
without her knowledge. There's no sense of violation -- just of a
secret delight.
I think it's one of the sexiest images in all of art:

Wednesday, April 18

ISLE OF THE DEAD
by
Lloydville
on Wed 18 Apr 2007 01:13 AM PDT

Above is an amazing image by the 19th-Century Swiss symbolist painter Arnold Böcklin -- Self Portrait With Death. I stumbled across it while looking for another Böcklin painting, The Isle Of the Dead, which Hitchcock reportedly used as a visual frame of reference for Vertigo.
The Isle Of the Dead (below) is almost as spooky as the self-portrait, and while it's not referenced directly in Vertigo,
its mood and basic visual strategy obviously informed a lot of the
film's compositions involving Madeleine, the ghostly, morbidly-obsessed
heroine, who often appears as a distant, deathly-still figure set
against backgrounds of dark trees and the sea.

Thursday, April 5

SIR LAWRENCE ALMA-TADEMA: A VICTORIAN ARTIST YOU SHOULD KNOW
by
Lloydville
on Thu 05 Apr 2007 06:55 AM PDT

Sir Lawrence Alma-Tadema might be the most ravishing
of all the Victorian academic painters. His luminous
photo-authoritative images of the ancient world are sensually and
historically seductive -- they seem to lay antiquity before us as it
might have appeared in real life were we to be magically transported
back into it.
In truth his visions are romantic, concentrating as
they do on sunny Mediterranean light, color, luxury and spectacle -- but they
convince the eye. His preoccupation with the illusion of spatial depth
draws us imaginatively into the scenes he conjures up, gives us a
visceral sense of participation in them.

The tradition of the Biblical epic in cinema pursued
Alma-Tadema's aims by other means but rarely achieved them with such
magnificent authority. The chariot race in Wyler's Ben-Hur perhaps
comes closest to involving us in a vision of the ancient world that
possesses a comparable enchantment and illusion of truth.

Wyler, and
second-unit director Yakima Canutt, who actually supervised most of the
filming of the chariot race, used the tracking shot in spectacular ways
to draw us into the cinematic universe of the sequence. A camera
moving through real spaces, photographing real people driving real
chariots was a powerful tool, but in a way its very power highlights
the effects Alma-Tadema was able to achieve with just paint and canvas.
He
was fine painter, as well as a fine storyteller -- the study below
gives a good idea of his purely painterly gifts, scarcely inferior to
Degas', for example:

The
20th-Century art establishment became suspicious of the meticulous
"finish" the academic painters gave their works, but the über-photographic illusion they were after, and the narrative ambitions
it served, remain potent and charming.

Saturday, March 31

A GEROME FOR TODAY
by
Lloydville
on Sat 31 Mar 2007 02:46 AM PDT

One of the artist's popular desert scenes. It's hard to imagine
that David Lean, or his cinematographer Freddie Young, didn't study
these when preparing to shoot Lawrence Of Arabia, which is like a series of Gérômes come to life.
Thursday, March 29

VICTORIAN ART AND THE CINEMA
by
Lloydville
on Thu 29 Mar 2007 01:53 AM PDT

In the mythology of modern art history the realist painters of the
Victorian era fought a losing battle with the photograph and eventually
capitulated to the dominant aesthetic of 20th-Century art, with its
irresistible (and progressive) trend towards a greater and greater
abstraction, abandoning both pictorial realism and almost all narrative
ambitions.
In fact, however, realist painters of the Victoria era conducted an
exciting and productive dialogue with the photograph, incorporating its
apparent authority but also, at the same time, extending its range of
representation beyond the technical limits of the 19th-Century camera.

Academic art surrendered not to the abstractions of the 20th-Century
painter but to the great artists of the early cinema, who assumed the
narrative and representational ambitions of academic art in a medium
which had, at least as far a popular taste went, better resources for
realizing those ambitions. You could almost say that the academic art
of the 19th-Century was born again, gloriously, in a new medium, which
it deeply influenced.

Academic art taught movies how to orchestrate photo-realistic elements
into theatrical forms, using lighting, framing and the placement of
figures in space to create a hyper-realistic illusion that had the
coherence of actual visual experience even when departing from it in
fabulous ways. Because film could capture motion, and thus emphasize
the plasticity of space far more expressively than the easel-painter,
it rendered the academic easel-painter's art passé. It was motion and
the greater illusion of spatial depth it allowed which lost academic
art its popular following.

But much more than that was lost, especially in the realm of color. Up
until very recent times, color film stocks couldn't begin to reproduce
the range of lighting conditions which the Victorian realist painters
gloried in. By marrying, through draftsmanship, an almost photographic
realism with an über-photographic sensitivity to color and light, the
Victorian painters anticipated cinematic effects which remain difficult
to achieve even today.
The attempt to devalue the work of Victorian painters, seeing them as
obstinate blocks to the steady progress of art, was a strategic ploy on
the part of 20th-Century modernist painters and their apologists in the
academy and the marketplace. Engaged in a project which would divorce
art from popular taste and arrive at an aesthetic dead end before the
end of the 20th century, they posited a straw man in the person of the
reactionary academic practitioner which lent their own schools an
undeserved glamor and prestige -- even as the academic practitioner was
informing and inspiring the great new popular art form of the movies.
But the intellectual disgrace of the Victorian painters also helped
impoverish cinema, because, after the first glorious blossoming of the
art in the silent era, filmmakers forgot academic painting. To get
back in touch with its lessons, they had to get back in touch with the
masters of the silent era, like Griffith, Vidor, Murnau and Ford, for
whom Victorian academic painting was a living form and a direct
inspiration of their techniques. The filmmakers who followed them had
to engage Victorian academic art at one remove, and thus lost touch
with the very forms which had inspired and instructed the original
pioneers of cinema.

The propaganda of the modernist painters, understandable from their
point of view, resulted in a great loss to the visual culture of the
20th-Century. It couldn't obliterate the glories of Victorian academic
painting, which survived, transformed, in movies and in popular
illustration (through the work of artists like N. C. Wyeth and Norman
Rockwell.) But it distorted the intellectual appreciation of a visual
tradition which might have been of great use to artists, film artists
especially, if they hadn't been shamed into despising it on principle.

I would argue that a new appreciation of Victorian realist painting has
the power to recharge the art of cinema in our time -- quite apart from
the pleasures to be gained by directly encountering a vital and
ravishing visual tradition.

Sunday, March 25

A TISSOT FOR TODAY
by
Lloydville
on Sun 25 Mar 2007 12:10 AM PDT
Ces Dames de Chars.
Notice how the lead horse gallops into an imaginary space in front of
the canvas, while the eye is simultaneously drawn in the opposite
direction, through a series of distinct interior spaces within the image -- the bright covered
arena, the darkened audience galleries -- that open up
behind the lady charioteers.
To read more about Tissot go here.
Tuesday, March 20

NORMAN ROCKWELL
by
Lloydville
on Tue 20 Mar 2007 12:01 AM PDT

Norman
Rockwell was not the least of the Victorian academic painters, even
though he lived in the 20th-Century. He perfected the
photo-authoritative aesthetic of the late Victorians and used it for
complex narrative purposes. The official Victorian academy was
swept away as a fountainhead of popular art by the invention of movies,
but Rockwell competed with movies directly and survived. Indeed,
he triumphed. His images seem like stills from imaginary
movies -- movies more wonderful and moving and entertaining than even
Hollywood could turn out.

I can't imagine that any filmmaker from Hollywood's so-called golden age, the studio era, wasn't
influenced on some level by Rockwell's art. Steven Spielberg, a
connoisseur and student of that golden age, has an original Rockwell
hanging behind the desk in his office.
Many modernist painters will admit to admiring
Rockwell, but the
20th-Century art establishment in general marginalized and even stigmatized his work for the crime of being popular in the mainstream
culture -- not just noticed and known but intensely loved -- and
for embracing a tradition linked to the achievement of the discredited
Victorians.
Anyone with eyes can see what nonsense that was.

Friday, March 9

JEAN-LEON GEROME: A VICTORIAN PAINTER YOU SHOULD KNOW
by
Lloydville
on Fri 09 Mar 2007 12:22 AM PST

The spooky, wonderful image above, Duel After A Masked Ball, was painted by
Jean-Léon Gérôme, one of the great masters of Victorian academic art.
To me, his work aspires to the condition of cinema and can be studied
in that regard with great profit. I think one finds in it, both
formally and in terms of subject matter, the reflection of many
concerns that would help shape the emerging art of movies.
Gérôme used a photo-authoritative style to make his
visions of Oriental scenes and his recreations of historical periods
alive and true to viewers who were beginning to process the visual
world more and more through the medium of photography. He was
concerned with narrative images and used the illusion of depth to draw
the viewer into those images -- the drama of space obsessed him. He
was so concerned with stereometric forms that he also worked regularly
as a sculptor.

Though he died in 1904, before movies came into their
own as a plastic and narrative medium, he would have thrilled, I think,
at their capacity to carry his aesthetic methods into new realms and elaborate them
fantastically.
Gérôme's Technicolor über-photographs can seem like
frame-grabs from imaginary movies. You can see the compositional style
of Lawrence Of Arabia (and John Ford) in his desert scenes . . .

. . . foreshadowings of Intolerance in his
18th-Century tableaux . . .

. . . the epic visions of De Mille in his
Biblical scenes . . .

Griffith, De Mille and Ford would have been familiar with Gérôme
directly -- his work was wildly popular and widely reproduced in
the time of their youth. Lean may have echoed Gérôme simply by
sharing his formal concerns, though it wouldn't surprise me at all if
Lean knew and admired his paintings. In any case, the profound
connection
between Victorian academic art and the cinema is nowhere more evident
than in the work of this great painter.
To me, the image below of Pygmalion's sculpture
Galatea coming to life can serve as a metaphor for the advent of movies,
when the aesthetic aspirations of the Victorian academic painter came
into fuller life through motion itself.

Sunday, February 25

BOUGUEREAU AND THE UBER-PHOTOGRAPH
by
Lloydville
on Sun 25 Feb 2007 04:33 AM PST

One objection commonly made to Victorian academic art is that it's too
"photographic" -- that it tried for a kind of photorealism which the
camera had made redundant.
I think this objection is misguided on two counts. The first is that
the "photorealism" of the Victorian academics far exceeded the capacities
of the 19th-Century camera. The academic painter could achieve color
effects which film stocks wouldn't be able to record until late in the 20th
Century. The Victorian academics could also capture motion in ways the
still camera could not until the early 20th-Century, with the advent of
faster film stocks and shutter speeds. The Victorian realist painter
was in fact developing his aesthetic in precisely those areas where the
cameras of the time were deficient.
More importantly, photorealism is not an aesthetic fault. Painters
since the Renaissance have often striven for hyper-realistic effects,
and have sometimes used proto-photographic technologies, like the camera obscura, to that
end. The fact that Van Eyck and Vermeer might possibly have used the camera
obscura as an aid in draftsmanship is surely not in itself a fault in
their methods. And many artists now seen as post-academic, like Degas,
used the camera itself as an aid to composition, and the photorealistic
aspect of their work constitutes a strong element of its appeal.
The Victorian academic painter, however, was doing something new in the
wake of the invention and widespread popularity of photography -- he
was conducting a conscious dialogue with the camera. He was
incorporating a new standard of visual authority introduced by the
camera, and doing it on purpose. He knew that the experience of
viewing photographs had introduced a new relationship to visual reality
in the mind of modern man. The Victorian realist painter didn't try to
ape the photograph, and he could exceed its resources in many areas,
but he always paid homage to its authority -- and he tried to construct
a new visual aesthetic based on that authority.

His effort in that regard was the basis for the magic of Victorian
academic art, for it popularity at the time and for its enduring
appeal. Apologists for the Victorian painters often try to downplay
this aspect of the academic style, try to reconnect them to the art
that had gone before them in an unbroken tradition. But they were
radical -- the photograph made them radical.

So Bouguereau wanted to show us nymphs and satyrs, wanted to show us
figures floating in mid air, but wanted us to receive the visions as
having the authority of photographs -- and not just the photographs
that an actual camera of the time could make but ideal photographs,
recording the subtlest effects of light, capturing the most fleeting
nuances of gesture. He wanted to make us feel that we were
looking at
an über-photograph. (Bouguereau's fantastical work is the best
place to start in a study of the über-photographic aesthetic, because,
unlike much Victorian academic art, it takes as its subjects things
which could not be observed or staged in real life and thus could not
be photographed. It's therefore doing something far more complex
than imitating contemporary photographic practice. If we can
locate the über-photographic aesthetic here, we can isolate it as a
purely conceptual strategy.)

And so one has the utter strangeness of Bouguereau -- decidedly
corporeal figures hovering above the ground, mythological figures with
the sex appeal of naughty photographic postcards, because they seem to
represent actual naked men and women with unimpeachable authority.
Some people find Bouguereau's nudes pornographic, and on one level they
are. Bouguereau has used his virtuosic technique to portray these
naked men and women as though they were real people recorded by a
camera, not visions transmitted through an artistic sensibility. They
have that hint of indecency, of violation, that always attaches in some
measure to photographs of naked people.
This not something to object to -- it's what makes Bouguereau cool,
exciting, new, radical. It's why his paintings are still alive for
people today, objects that rivet the attention, whatever judgment the
mind may be passing on them as works of art. How much more
complicated, courageous, inventive, witty was Bouguereau's response to
the photograph than that of the modernist rebels who simply walked away from
it, turned to abstraction in defiance of the photograph's power.
That power has not diminished over time -- indeed much of our
conception of the world we live in today is determined, overdetermined,
by the photograph. Which is why on some level Bouguereau speaks to us
more deeply than the abstractionists do. Bouguereau draws us
into that same dialogue with the photograph that he himself conducted,
and in transcending its power -- by seeming to carry it farther than it
can ever actually go, even in the age of Photoshop -- he places it in a truer
perspective than the modernists could ever have conceived.
A
distinguished museum director has observed how difficult it is to
hang Bouguereau in a modern museum -- discerning a disconnect not only
between Bouguereau and 20th-Century modernism but also between
Bouguereau and the great high-art tradition his work seems to
inhabit. That is precisely because Bouguereau's work strove for a
transcendent synthesis of painting and photography -- something
no art before him could have done and no institutionally-sanctioned art
after him has chosen to
do. His work is
thus profoundly modern, more genuinely modern in some ways than the
work of the 20th-Century abstractionists. It may be, in fact,
that Bouguereau is so
modern, so radical, that for some time to come he will need a room all
to himself.
[I think the concept of the über-photograph is a useful way of
distinguishing the style of the early pre-Raphaelites from the
mainstream of Victorian academic art that emerged after them.
Rossetti had a fundamentally
painterly aesthetic with a strong bent towards the stylized and
decorative, a bent developed most conspicuously in the work of William
Morris. The academic painters of the second half of the
19th-Century
departed from both in adopting a photo-authoritative strategy, however
fanciful their subjects. Burne-Jones was a key transitional
figure in
this process. Though he held onto many of the painterly and
decorative
elements of Rossetti's style one begins to see in his work a shift
towards the photo-realistic -- mainly in his strict stereometric
modeling of forms and figures, which gave his paintings a sculptural
quality. It was the quality of relief-sculpture, however -- he
rarely
pursued the bold evocations of deep space that so preoccupied
Alma-Tadema, Lord Leighton, Tissot and Waterhouse, to take a few
examples. Their strategies with regard to spatial illusion were
closely connected to the über-photographic aesthetic. By the same
token, the idea of the über-photograph can be used to distinguish the
project of Victorian academic painters from the sterile photo-realism of some
modern painters, who are consciously evoking and aping the photograph
and not trying to transcend its limitations, not trying for a new
visual synthesis.]

The images above come from a remarkable web site -- that of the Art Renewal Center,
an organization dedicated with almost evangelical zeal to the
rehabilitation of Victorian academic art. They have online
galleries with thousands of examples of the form -- wandering through
them is a magical (and mind-expanding) experience.
Wednesday, February 21

JAMES TISSOT: A VICTORIAN ARTIST YOU SHOULD KNOW
by
Lloydville
on Wed 21 Feb 2007 12:03 AM PST

James Tissot was known for two things -- his immensely popular Bible
illustrations and his paintings of contemporary Victorian society.
My friend Paul Zahl says that the Bible illustrations influenced the
iconography of the early Hollywood Biblical epics, and he may be right,
but I'm not a big fan of these works, aesthetically speaking.
They're drawn in a looser, more impressionistic and decorative style
than his easel paintings, and to me don't have the same power.
The easel paintings strike me as downright stunning. In them the
use of an almost photographic draftsmanship and sometimes subtle but always highly
dramatic evocations of spatial depth result in works that utterly
enchant me.

Tissot had a number of compositional strategies for producing an
impression of spatial depth. The most characteristic was the
depiction of semi-enclosed spaces with portals onto wider spaces
beyond, which cause the eye to come to rest momentarily in the
foreground space and then to explore the background space, which
reveals itself almost as a surprise, a release.
Tissot also had a knack for compositions involving larger groups in a
public space, like a ballroom, in which the empty areas of the scene
suggest the potential for action within it. The strategy is very
explicit in the painting below, Too Early, in which the future of
the evening unfolds like a ghostly vision around the few early arrivals
waiting for the festivities to begin.

This is a perfect example of how visual space can be charged with
emotion -- we populate the half-empty ballroom with future dancing, just as
the early arrivals do . . . we enter into the emotional anticipation of
these folks who've arrived a little too soon.

Tissot's genius at suggesting depth through composition and modeling
also allowed him to produce canvases which shimmer with surface colors,
like the canvases of the Impressionists, but almost simultaneously draw
our imaginations irresistibly into the space depicted -- something the
Impressionists were rarely concerned to do. The effect is
magical, and one that movies would soon learn to achieve in more
spectacular ways than the academic Victorian painters had at their
command. Their most potent charm was appropriated, and their
school of painting faded into history.
But when we look at Tissot's paintings today, when our imaginations are
drawn into the spaces of his world, we can achieve a remarkable sense
of intimacy with the Victorian society he observed, we can share the
concerns and sometimes even the emotions of its long-vanished
inhabitants . . . and there's an enchantment in that which will never
fade.

Friday, February 16

VICTORIAN ACADEMIC PAINTING
by
Lloydville
on Fri 16 Feb 2007 02:14 AM PST

Faced with the invention of photography, academic painters of the
Victorian era (like James Tissot above and Jules Lefebvre below) at
first tried to compete with the new technology on its
own terms -- by creating super-realistic images that had the advantage
of being in color and could convey a more convincing suggestion of
narrative or of the flux of ordinary life. Posed photographs
tended to look posed, largely because long exposure times required
subjects to stay frozen in fixed positions for many seconds at a
time. The
academic painter could achieve effects with his figures that seemed in some ways, paradoxically,
more naturalistic, more lifelike than anything the 19th-Century camera
could capture. These effects constituted the realist painter's only areas of advantage over the
"scientific" authority of the photographic record.

The Victorian academic painters concentrated on producing an illusion
of depth in the image (again competing in this with the photograph and
especially the stereoscopic photograph) and located their
expressiveness in the drama of
space itself, drawing the eye into the painting as a prelude to
seducing the mind into the emotional content of the scene depicted, as
in the painting below by John William Waterhouse:

They were enormously successful in this, across a wide range of genres
-- from historical tableaux to contemporary social observations.
The Impressionist school which challenged the academic style tended to
downplay spatial drama and bring the surface texture of the painting
itself, and the sheer drama of color, into prominence. The
Impressionists generally abandoned historical subjects and concentrated
on contemporary scenes. There were some painters who almost
straddled the two schools, like John Singer Sargent and Gustave
Caillebotte -- but to me these two painters remained primarily in the
academic camp, because a precise, stereometric modeling of forms and
an insistence on the drama of space tended to loom larger in their work
than either the free treatment of paint on canvas or the pure
celebration of color as an end in itself.
Caillebotte hung out (and hung his work) with the Impressionists but
his best paintings, like the scene below, are almost categorically
academic:

Sargent, though he made his living primarily by painting portraits of
the sort of people who favored academic art, was enchanted by the
Impressionists' free use of paint, but even at his most unruly in this
regard he remained at heart captivated by the drama of space and solid forms, which can
be seen in this exquisite interior whose subtly dramatic framing draws
our eye past the surface of the canvas into the room depicted:

The i |