There's
now a button in the column to the left (Film Reviews A-Z) which will
take you to a list of all the movies reviewed on the site and allow you
to link to them directly.
|
|
||||
|
Login
This Month
Month Archive
|
Tuesday, July 3
by
Lloydville
on Tue 03 Jul 2007 12:05 PM PDT
![]() People who love film noir also love to argue about what films belong in the category and what films don't. They compile lists of films noirs and break them down into subcategories. The general drift of this activity is to call almost any film noir as long as it was made in Hollywood in the 1940s or 1950s, in black and white, and features moody lighting, cynical attitudes and some content related to crime. This inclusiveness is abetted by studio home video departments, which will designate any film with the above attributes a film noir because the label is sexy and apparently helps sell DVDs. In the process, the term gets so vague as to be useless. I would argue that there is a core set of films that are truly and uniquely noir, reflecting a particular time in America, with a particular mind-set, a mood of existential dread that seemed to invade the American psyche after the end of WWII, at the beginning of the atomic age. This sense of dread was in the air before then, of course, as the world hurtled towards war. It can be felt very clearly in some dark films made during the war -- in Hitchcock's Shadow Of A Doubt, in Wilder's Double Indemnity, in Huston's The Maltese Falcon. The first two of those films, along with Leave Her To Heaven, fall into a distinct category of their own -- the domestic noir. ![]() The Maltese Falcon seems on its surface to belong to another distinct category, the hardboiled detective thriller, which had noirish elements but whose essentially noble protagonist rescued it from existential dread. Yet Bogart's Sam Spade seems to be losing faith in the nobility of his code, to see it as meaningless, and I think that fact alone allows one to call The Maltese Falcon a true film noir. Just compare Bogart's Spade to his Phillip Marlowe in The Big Sleep, which plays like a hardboiled romantic comedy by comparison with Huston's film. The point about The Maltese Falcon can be argued, of course, and I place it among the true films noirs with that reservation in mind. Here are some of the other films I think of as truly noir, without such reservations: Out Of the Past The Killers His Kind Of Woman The Dark Corner The Set-Up Gun Crazy Fallen Angel Angel Face Touch Of Evil Detour The Wrong Man Criss Cross The Killing In A Lonely Place On Dangerous Ground Crossfire Where the Sidewalk Ends Brute Force The Sweet Smell Of Success Night and the City Thieves Highway The Lady From Shanghai 14 Hours The Long Night Nightmare Alley Odds Against Tomorrow Act Of Violence Crime Wave They Live By Night Decoy The Big Steal Side Street Where Danger Lives Tension Kansas City Confidential The Big Combo Gilda Note that not all of these films end badly for the protagonist, and not all of them feature femmes fatales -- several actually have femmes that rescue the protagonist, and in one of them the protagonist is rescued, just as improbably, by Jesus. But in all of them the protagonist needs rescuing, in all of them he's lost in a nightmare world that's existentially different from the world that existed before WWII and he can't, by his own efforts, get out of it. Even a film like His Kind Of Woman, which goofs comically on this world, is also recognizing it. ![]() In future posts I'll list some of the films commonly called noir which I don't think really are, because, though they may reflect to one degree or another the same existential dread as the true noir, they don't acknowledge it as a profound and inescapable condition. It's almost a spiritual distinction, and therefore hard to define precisely, but I think it's one worth making. |
Favorites
|
||


