As every political junkie must know by now, Texas had a two-step system for choosing delegates to the Democratic Convention this August -- a primary in which about two-thirds of the delegates would be selected and a caucus in which about a third of the delegates would be selected.
Only the results of the primary voting were known in the wee hours of 5 March -- Hillary Clinton won in that voting, by a three-percent margin. The cable news services, anxious to put a period to the day's events, reported that Clinton had "won Texas", and this has become the story out of Texas, Clinton's "Texas victory" one aspect of her "comeback".
But with about 40% of the caucus votes tabulated it is clear that Obama will win the caucus by a substantial margin and that he will gain about six delegates overall from the Texas election. By any measure, he will win Texas, because he will win more delegates there.
Don't expect the corporate media to tell you this, or to make anything of it. The "Texas story" is set in stone now -- Obama's victory in Texas, when it becomes official, will just be a footnote.
The pundits of cable news are clowns, parroting the predictions of fallible polls and dutifully reporting whatever spin the respective camps decide to put out, without making the slightest effort to evaluate the reliability of the press releases or media conference calls. They will justify themselves by saying that they're just reporting on "the perception" that Clinton won Texas, even though they created that perception by irresponsible reporting.
They're riding the idiot wind.