I understand the concept of voting for the lesser of two evils, but what is the end game for this approach if the lesser evil is consistently worse than the lesser evil that came before? Is it possible to draw the line anywhere?
If you can’t draw the line at Obama — at the abolition of habeas corpus and due process, at extra-judicial murder by Presidential fiat, at impunity for Wall Street criminals — can you draw it anywhere?
And if the plutocracy can go on counting on your vote for evil as long as it puts up a greater evil in opposition, who wins in the long term?
Things will change only when people draw a line beyond which their conscience won’t let them proceed. Where is your line? Do you even have one?