TWO RODE TOGETHER

TwoRodeTogetherPosterBaja

Dramatic geniuses can get a bit eccentric towards the end of their careers. In his late romances, Shakespeare pretty much abandoned plausibility and consistency of tone — he just threw together incidents and scenes and characters and language that interested him and cobbled them together this way or that. He basically said “fuck you” to the “well-made play” and pleased himself.

Winter'sTaleEngraving

The results were both magical and unsettling. The same can be said of many of John Ford’s late-career movies. They’re not tightly constructed, they veer around drunkenly between themes and dramatic arcs, with the director concentrating on the stuff that interested him, whether it had a clear structural function or not, and fecklessly tossing off the other stuff.

DonovansReef

This is true of Donavan’s Reef (above) and Cheyenne Autumn — both of which are uneven as dramatic works but have passages of great beauty, as powerful and moving as any in Ford’s work.

Two Rode Together Stewart Widmark Opening

It’s true also of Two Rode Together, above, a Ford film from 1961.  The film starts off at a stately pace, apparently setting up a buddy adventure between the characters played by its two stars, Jimmy Stewart and Richard Widmark.  But Ford quickly loses interest in the adventure.  He pauses to let the two great actors banter with each other, in leisurely and absolutely riveting exchanges.  He makes breathtakingly beautiful shots of horses and wagons moving across the landscape and neglects the visual possibilities in scenes that have dramatic weight in the story.

TwoRodeRiverScene

The adventure sort of fizzles out by the end, but by then Ford has switched his interest to the sexual and racial dynamics in the romantic subplots his leads get entangled in.

TwoRodeCristalBaja

It’s like listening to a great storyteller drinking and talking by the fire, getting sloshed and losing the thread of the tale he started out to tell, but still captivating you with his voice and with the brilliance of his digressions.

TwoRodeFordDirects

The result is a perplexing film that is also great and immensely pleasurable — like Shakespeare’s The Winter’s Tale.  You know that wherever the tale is going, the journey is going to be worth it — maybe not in the ways you expected but  . . . somehow.

Click on the images to enlarge or isolate.

4 thoughts on “TWO RODE TOGETHER

  1. Loved your comparison to the drunken storyteller…and to Shakespeare…no wonder I like Ford, A Winter’s Tale was the first work that captured my interest in the Bard and remains a favorite.

  2. I’ve probably seen Two Rode Together three or four times, but not in the last twenty five years. There is a scene that always struck me odd as to why it was not reshot. It’s a serious scene with an impassioned Jimmy Stewart, starting to say his lines and stuttering on the first syllable, as is his wont, but being hung up a fraction of a second longer than usual to the point of producing some discomfort to the viewer; we’re not watching a story unfold, but an actor unwind as he tries to spit out his lines. Widmark, whose in the background, puts his hand in front of his mouth to hide that he has gone out of character and laughing at Stewart’s inability to say his lines. Your take on Ford’s narrative style here, turns this scene from odd and sloppy to complementary and enriching. Thanks for the insight.

    • Don’t recall that moment precisely, Henry, but I’ll look for it the next time I watch the film. Ford did seem to enjoy just watching Stewart and Widmark interacting in front of the camera — hence that long take by the river.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *