INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS

Last week I had an urge to mainline a twist of pure cinema so I went off to see Inglourious Basterds.  I was hoping for something visceral and crazy and maybe a tiny bit original.  I got all of that and more.

Baudelaire said that genius is the ability to call back childhood at will.  The ability to call back adolescence at will is, I guess, a lesser kind of genius, but Quentin Tarantino has it.  This is not the same thing as pandering to adolescents, which is what Hollywood mostly does these days — repackaging material with proven appeal to teenage boys, dressing it up with loud sounds and  CGI to make it feel new.  Tarantino seems to be able to channel his inner teen in an organic way.

He also seems to be able to step back and watch himself doing it — which is what makes Inglourious Basterds so interesting.  Brad Pitt's brilliant evocation of an action hero from the Sixties has all the insouciant appeal of Steve McQueen at his best, but also comments on McQueen's essential dumbness.  The complex hall of mirrors that is the film's narrative gets us to cheer at preposterous, wish-fulfilling violence, and also to laugh derisively at people who cheer at preposterous wish-fulfilling violence.  Tarantino puts Nazi uniforms on the people we're meant to laugh at, but that only goes so far in enabling our denial about what we're doing when we root for the horrifyingly brutal good guys.

Perhaps the most astonishing thing about the film is its narrative style.  Its ads promise wild, extreme and nearly incoherent violence, and we get that on a regular basis, but only as eruptions from a slow, deliberate storytelling strategy.  There are a number of extended scenes that play out with an almost glacial evolution of suspense, concentrating on the tiniest details of behavior, the subtlest inflections of dialogue.

Like Tarantino's best films, it's a movie about talking — sometimes talking at great length.  The fact that such a film could dominate the box office for a few weeks gives the lie to everything Hollywood thinks it knows about the attention span of the modern audience.  The modern audience, like every audience in the history of humankind, has infinite patience for the deliberate elaboration of a story — as long as it's a good story.  Titanic proved this beyond question over a decade ago — Hollywood still hasn't gotten the message.

Inglourious Basterds isn't a great movie, but it's a real movie — which makes it great enough in this day and age.  Although it remixes ideas and tropes and genres and movies from the past — from The Dirty Dozen to Pierrot Le Fou — it arrives somewhere new.  It takes chances, not least in its return to the most conservative of narrative conventions.  It violates disreputable expectations even as it satisfies disreputable expectations — it leaves you off balance at every turn.

Perhaps the highest praise I can give it is that, at its heart, it doesn't have even a whiff of cynicism about it.  It believes that the art of movies is still alive, still developing, still capable of messing with your mind instead of lulling you to sleep.  Tarantino may not have a clear idea about what to do with this capacity, this awesome potential, but he's determined to do something, and in Inglourious Basterds he has.

For an appreciation of Tarantino's faithfulness to genuine cinematic form as it relates to shot construction, read this important essay by Steven Boone:

Inglourious Snatch

GROSS

John Edwards is so gross that I almost can't stand to look at him — and yet, at the same time, as with a bad traffic accident, it's so hard to look away.

He shows us, if nothing else, that a man's hair can sometimes be a window onto his soul.

THE FLYING SAUCER OF LOVE

Here's a second report from Dr. Paul (of The Zahl File) on a strange place he went and a strange thing he saw on his travels this summer:

FINNISH MODERN . . .
EVEN THOUGH THERE ARE MARTIANS

by Paul (“Famous Monsters”) Zahl


Last month, my wife Mary and I led a group of friends into Helsinki's Rock Church, as it is now called in English.  It is the Temppeliaukio in the Finnish language.



This
is a Lutheran parish church not far from downtown that is now
celebrated as being one of the most innovative worship spaces in
Europe.  It was excavated and constructed in 1969 within a hill of rock
and is now surrounded by a beautiful square of townhouses. The Rock
Church was designed by two brothers, Timo and Tuomo Suomalainen.  It
was dubbed initially and locally as the “Anti-Devil Defense Bunker” but
is now treasured and loved.  It is a working church and the location for
many concerts, especially on its prized organ.  When we walked in,
Sibelius's Violin Concerto was being played.

But I was interested in seeing the church for a somewhat different reason:

It looks just like a flying saucer.  As a matter of fact, it could be a flying saucer.

When
you look down on the Rock Church from the square above, it appears to
be a saucer of light bursting from the ground, or, conversely,
embedding itself in the ground.  It especially resembles the
earth-craft touching down on Altair IV in
Forbidden Planet, not to mention the Martian saucer in Invaders from Mars,
and even more to the point, it is a lookalike for the saucers that
hide beneath the sea and within the earth, in the odd Canadian move
from 1977 entitled
Starship Invasions.



In other words, this is the coolest church in Christendom.  It requires a shout-out!

Can
we stop and think for a sec about what the Rock Church is saying?  It
is saying there is something precious buried within a rockpile just
outside the city.  Whether the precious thing is coming out, bursting
out; or whether it is burying itself, embedding itself in granite, is
unclear.  But it is definitely rooted in the earth.  It could not be
more rooted.

Is it preparing to be a “sleeper cell”, like the alien machines in the Steven Spielberg version of War of the Worlds?  Or is it emerging from centuries of frozen sleep below the Arctic ice cap, as in The Atomic Submarine, from 1959? (Just so you know, ahem, The Criterion Collection has done up the
latter in a box set, together with three other classics related to it, like

Corridors of Blood
.)



What is it doing in our midst?  We don't know.

But there is something here.  Whatever religion is
or could be, it is embedded in the nature of things.  It is not so
high, quoting the Bible, that we can't reach up to it, nor is it so
low, that we can't reach down to it.  But it
is here, to be
discovered within the nature of things.  It is in the root of a man,
and of the earth.  The Rabbi Jeshua said, “The kingdom of God is within
you.”  He did not spell out what he meant exactly.  Many people have
thought about this, and sought to fill in the blanks.  Nobody knows for
sure what he was intending.  But whatever it is, it is here.  It's an
open secret.  “Take A Look Around” (Sergio Mendes and Brazil '66).

If
you see what is really here, what is in front of you and above you and
below you, you're probably looking at it.


We can even get high-brow for a moment.  Goethe has a beautiful passage in Wilhelm Meister's Apprenticeship in which he describes the nature of religion as understood within a utopian school for children.  The children look up in order to express reverence.  They look around in order to observe the natural world, their environment.  And they look down in
order “to recognize humility and poverty, mockery and despite, disgrace
and wretchedness, suffering and death, to recognize these things as
divine; nay, even on sin and crime to look not as hindrances, but to
honor and love them as furtherances of what is holy.”


                                                                                                                              [Photo by Mary Zahl]


I think the lesson of the Rock Church, which is a world-class architectural site on account of its perfect resemblance to
an alien flying saucer, is this: the truth is here, embedded in rock,
unerodable through fashion or time, right in the marrow of the earth
and hearts, digging in or breaking out, and filled, just filled, with
light.

WAGON MASTER

I just finished watching the new DVD of John Ford's Wagon Master — a beautiful transfer of a very beautiful film.  I'm speaking from a place of unexpected emotion at the moment, but I think what I'm about to say is true all the same — Wagon Master is John Ford's greatest film.

More on this subject soon . . .

FAREWELL TO THE RANCH . . . AND A CODA


                                                                                                                      [Photo by Hugh McCarten]

It was sad to leave the Carneys’ beautiful ranch and so many good friends, so many good people, some of whom I’ve known since time out of mind, some of whom, like Corinne and Ella and Will, have just been born (relatively speaking.)  But . . .

The heart must pause to breathe
And love itself must rest.

So I jumped in The Ghost and headed, not south towards home, but north to Cody, Wyoming, the town founded by Buffalo Bill which now hosts The Buffalo Bill Historical Center, a museum I wanted to check out.  Cody is about four hours north of Jackson.

The Irma Hotel which Bill built back in 1902, named for one of his daughters, is still there in Cody, and not much changed outwardly, but it doesn’t welcome smokers — Bill and his cigars would be turned away, I guess — so I checked into a lovely, hospitable Super 8, had a few beers and crashed.

I was up bright and early for the opening of the Historical Center, which I soon discovered is one of America’s great museums.  It’s not only packed with artifacts from Bill’s life and Wild West show — the things I went there to see — but also has a superb gallery of Western art, another devoted to Plains Indian culture and a firearms museum that boggles the imagination.

The Western art gallery has several wonderful N. C. Wyeths, as well as fine works by Catlin, Russell, Remington and just about every other Western artist of note.  The Plains Indian exhibit has examples of exquisite Indian craft, some of them dating back to pre-Civil War days.

The Buffalo Bill galleries are filled with supremely evocative memorabilia.  You can stand near a skirt and jacket once worn by Annie Oakley and see how small she was.  You can see what’s left of Lucretia Borgia, Bill’s legendary buffalo hunting rifle.  Outside, you can even see the house where Bill was born, above, transported there from the banks of the Mississippi River in Iowa.

You can see the original Deadwood Stage used in the Wild West show, above, as well as a back-up coach used on one of Bill’s European tours, below — most of the crowned heads of Europe were given rides in this coach as a special treat:

Standing in the presence of these vehicles sent chills down my spine — they were part of the spectacle that created the legend of the Old West in the American imagination, and the world’s imagination.

Before leaving town I had a meal at the Irma.  The old saloon with the famous cherrywood bar, above, has been preserved, with the old cash register still in place.

But the saloon is just a restaurant now, a non-smoking restaurant.  There are Western knick-knacks lined up on the shelf behind the bar, under the big mirror, instead of bottles of spirituous beverages.

Overweight tourists in shorts line up at a buffet to load on more weight in a room where Bill Cody and General Phil Sheridan, hard-bitten princes among men, once drank Brandy and puffed on cheroots, talking over old times on the frontier.

Our strain grows weaker.

That afternoon I had an awesome drive through Yellowstone National Park on my way to Idaho Falls, where I stayed in one last motel before the final leg of my journey, a long haul back to Las Vegas.  It was good to be home again, filled with such memories.

At the heart of those memories was the music my friends played up in Wyoming, still echoing in my ears.

BEATLES: ABOUT THE MUSIC

The achievement of The Beatles was centered around the songwriting craft of Lennon and McCartney.  They had, first of all, a gift for melody — something that's beyond analysis, beyond fashion and beyond criticism.  Irving Berlin and Abba had the same gift, and if you can't appreciate the melodies of Abba, because the group was so un-hip, or the melodies of Irving Berlin, because he wrote show tunes, you don't really like music — you've got other things on your mind when you're listening to it.

But allowing for that gift, Lennon and McCartney were craftsmen — like Abba and Berlin.  They understood their pop idiom and wrote for pop's audience, for the market.  When they had trouble getting a song to the top of the charts in the U. S., even as they grew more popular there, they analyzed the reasons for this and added hand-claps to “I Want To Hold Your Hand”, thinking this would give the song a more “American” feel.  (Brian Epstein had earlier encouraged them to write this particular song expressly for the American market.)  It worked — the song was their first U. S. chart-topper.

In their first few years of success the demand for new material from the team was intense and they met it with an astonishing productivity.  They wrote 13 new songs for A Hard Day's Night in a matter of months, mostly on the road with a grueling concert schedule, and almost all of those songs are now revered as pop classics.  McCartney said they never, when collaborating, spent more than three hours on any one song.  They were consummate professionals.

What made the group, as a group, phenomenal, was what they did with their original songs.  It was a magical combination of small things.  The Beatles weren't the hardest-rocking group in the world, and only Lennon had a gut-level feel for the blues roots that nourished American rock.  When McCartney did his vocal impersonations of Elvis or Little Richard, he managed to leave out the sinuous rhythmic improvisation around the beat that gave those performers soul.

What they did have was, to paraphrase George Martin, ears.  They were open to all the musical influences that fed pop — country-western, show tunes, British music hall ditties, and such elements of rhythm and blues as they could master.  Eventually they added a new influence, Eastern music, by way of George Harrison.  But they mixed them all up into their own brew, based solely on what sounded good to them.  None of them was musically literate — they'd had no formal training and couldn't read music.  They relied on instinct.  No musical device was too corny for them, if it sounded right, yet at the same time they came up with highly unconventional harmonies that hadn't been heard in Western music since Monteverdi.

They worked within tradition but only because they'd absorbed so much of it into their own style intuitively.  In an effort to reproduce American rock music they made up new twists on it, by a process of what Harold Bloom called “creative misreading”.  To them, if it sounded like rock music, it was rock music, and so they expanded the idea of what rock music could be.

In playing their songs they also combined a lot of small, simple things into an arresting whole.  Ringo, perhaps the most under-appreciated musician of the group, had a rock-steady beat and a simple style, boring and unimaginative to some, but he inflected it with a lilt, a subtle impulse that propelled every song forward joyfully.  McCartney provided unusually melodic base lines which also added a subliminal lilt to their numbers — not something you had to notice consciously to feel.

Harrison grew by leaps and bounds as a lead guitarist over the life of the band, but even his earliest riffs, when he sounds like a talented kid trying out stuff in the garage, have a sure sense of the grace notes the songs need to take them to another level.  Lennon's brash, urgent work on rhythm guitar gave the group's sound at least a hint of funk.

Their vocal styles were individually distinctive but they were always ready to sublimate individuality to the sound of the whole.  This gave them enormous range by very elemental means.  Paul could do his crooner or his rock-shouter bits when required, Lennon could rave or insinuate sweetly — singing in close harmony together they could be something else again, a duo like none anybody had ever heard.

The combinations Lennon and McCartney could concoct from their individual and collaborative vocal styles were remarkable.  On “A Hard Day's Night” they take turns on lead, in different sections of the song.  Sometimes one will back the other with a harmony part, sometimes one will double-track his own vocal.  They play around with different levels of reverb.  The subtle variety of it, hard to keep up with unless you listen very closely, is one of the things that give the recording such a feeling of life and surprise, however many times you listen to it.  (It's easier than ever to keep up with it, by the way, on the new remasters.)

Ringo and George had less range and virtuosity as singers but distinct qualities of their own, which added spice and another kind of variety to the mix.

Pop music isn't the most profound art form in the world, though it's capable of conveying profound truths.  (“We learned more from a three-minute record than we ever leaned at school” is how Bruce Springsteen once put it.)  None of The Beatles had the melodic chops of a Jerome Kern, or the literary chops of a Lorenz Hart, or the musical chops of a Louis Armstrong, or the vocal chops of a Frank Sinatra — all those residents of the pop-music Parnassus.  But they used everything they did have to its fullest, they used the pop idiom to its fullest, and in the process they created miracles, one after the other, for almost a decade.

There was no artistic achievement in the 20th Century more impressive than their collected body of work.  It still vibrates with the immediacy of the creative energy and the clear-eyed craftsmanship that produced it.  The albums all sound as if they were recorded yesterday, as though they're being recorded live while you listen to them.  This is a quality that belongs only to the very greatest art.

THE LAST SONGS


                                                                                                                            [Photo by Corinne Chubb]

The grand gathering began to disperse after the night of the big birthday bash — J. B. and Cotty, hammered by too much fun, seek mutual support, above, as they wait for a plane at the Jackson airport.

A small crowd remained for one more day of fun and a last night of music.


                                                                                                                  [Photo by Hugh McCarten]

I sat and dreamed on the patio, and tried to write the words for a song Eli was working on, without success.  The other remaining guests went for another float on the river.

Eli serenaded Elaine as she came into view around a bend.


                                                                                                                       [Photo by Hugh McCarten]

That night, John's cousin Marina (above, with the author) had us all over to her house for dinner.  She served us delicious elk steaks from elk she had shot herself on the ranch.  Impressive.

Eli, Hugh and John played some tunes in Marina's living room — the site of a now famous hootenanny seven years ago on the last occasion most of this crowd had been together.

It was a good way to wind down from the intense fun of the past days.

BEATLES

At 9:45 on the morning of 9 September 2009 I found myself outside a Best Buy in southwest Las Vegas waiting for the store to open.  I was hoping to snag copies of the box sets of Beatles remasters, which had sold out pre-release on Amazon before I could order them.  There were about fifteen other guys waiting with me — no women.  “They can't all be here to get the Beatles boxes,” I thought, but with one exception they were.

I'm always surprised that there are other people in the world as crazy as I am.  The boxes would be available elsewhere eventually — it takes a bit of passion to want them desperately on the day of release.  The Beatles were a group, after all, which BROKE UP nearly forty years ago, and none of them had died recently.  I'm also quite sure that everybody waiting outside the Best Buy with me already had every Beatles recording on CD, as I did.  But they were supposed to sound better on the new CDs.  It was, as always, about the music.

That may seem like an odd assertion, since The Beatles have always been about so much more than the music.  They were, almost from the start, a phenomenon, a cultural force.  Now that phenomenon is laced with nostalgia.  If you came of age in the Sixties The Beatles are a permanent part of the soundtrack of your life, and at this point you have listened to their recordings so many times that it's hard to hear them anymore.



About half the guys lined up outside the Best Buy were middle-aged, like me.  The other half seemed to be in their thirties — they probably first encountered The Beatles in their parents' record collections.  Younger folks don't think in terms of “record collections” anymore — they think in terms of mp3 playlists.

When the doors opened most of the Best Buy sales force was lined up by a table displaying some of the store's few copies of the stereo box set — they seemed proud to welcome us, like a reception committee.  This was going to be a fun moment in retailing.  I grabbed a stereo box set, and soon the others on the table were gone.

“We have a bigger display in the back!” a salesman said, and the group raced to find it.  There were a few more stereo box sets there, but only two copies of the elusive mono set, which were snapped up before I could even identify them.

This Best Buy had sold its entire stock of Beatles boxes — very expensive items — in about one and a half minutes.  A black guy who had been in the crowd outside, observing the commotion, asked me what it was all about.  When I told him, he shrugged, mystified.  The rubber soul of the Beatles had obviously never gotten to him.

I stopped in rather hopelessly at a Barnes and Noble on my way to a grocery store to see if they had any mono box sets, but they hadn't gotten even a single copy of it.  They had three copies of the stereo box set, sequestered behind the front desk, and a list of fifteen people who'd signed up for them in advance.

So . . . that music I was talking about . . .

If you're wondering how much better the new remasters could possibly sound, the answer is — a lot better.  If you close your eyes when you're listening to them you can almost imagine you're hearing them on vinyl.  They have the warmth and “roundness” of vinyl recordings (to a degree) and a clarity that's mesmerizing.  Ringo's drums sound like drums, McCartney's melodic base lines are wonderfully distinct.  You can hear the lads taking breaths between lines of the vocals.

Listening on headphones, you get a sense you're inside the music.  The effect is so transporting that you really can hear the songs again — you even forget which song is coming next (sometimes).

There are sonic and musical revelations aplenty, and in an upcoming post I'll talk about those revelations . . . about the music.

BIRTHDAYS


                                                                                                                         [Photo by Hugh McCarten]

The evening of our third day at the ranch was what we'd all come for.  Two birthdays, two birthday cakes and one hell of a party.

John's cake arrived with fireworks.


                                                           [Photo by Hugh McCarten]

Elaine's was all about the sheer drama of chocolate and sugar.  The cakes capped an amazing feast, and were followed by more music.  Elaine started things off with a song dedicated to John.  She said she never sang, even though John always asked her to — so she gave him the gift of singing a song called “Something Great”.  It was by far the musical highlight of the week, emotionally speaking — straight from the heart . . . right on target, so direct.

Among many other great musical moments was John's lead vocal on an old Dylan song, “Tomorrow Is A Long Time”.

John's cousin Marina, a veteran of many legendary gatherings at the ranch, and about whom more later, had rolled into town for the occasion — many local friends also joined the festivities.


                                                                                                          [Photo by Eli Dokson]

Above, the author with Cotty's daughter Corinne and John's son Will.  Will and I had some great conversations about stuff like film noir while others chattered on about subjects decidedly less cool.  Corinne contributed materially to the general hilarity by agreeing to read the touching spoken interlude of “The Salami Song”, a little thing John and I wrote on a drunken evening in New York, back when dinosaurs ruled the earth.  It's a number that never fails to bring a tear to the eye and to remind us all of the dangers of mixing alcohol and songwriting.

JAE'S HOOD: A REPORT FROM BROOKLYN

My friend Jae Song lives in a remote section of Brooklyn, once utterly desolate and a refuge for Bohemians pushed out of Manhattan by the Duppies and Big Nanny and high rents.  (If they extended the L train out to Kansas, there would be a new enclave of disenchanted New York Bohemians flourishing there within months.)  There are signs of change, though — as more and more of the sort of folks who
have made Manhattan the capital of Connecticut arrive, seeking to experience vicariously the
juice of the island as it once was.  The irony is that eventually these Duppies will bring Big Nanny and high rents with them, and the Bohemians will have to move on once again.


Here's a recent report from Jae on how things are going at the edge of Brooklyn, with some great photos he took.  The place still sounds like it's got some edge left:


DESOLATION ROW



So I live in an industrial waste land . . .
haven't really gone out much here . . . though I hear more and more that
there's a lot of places to go now that all the hipsters have taken over.


I went to a show — a friend's band was playing.  The place was in the middle of nowhere — really — no cars, no people . . . I
couldn't find the place at first but saw some others looking lost and
followed them and found it.



Across the street was a little poker game with a bunch of big old scary
dudes
.  More big old scary dudes were in the back.




The show was at this hipster kid's loft he's made into some weird place
with a stage and a recording booth.  H
e sold cheap cold beer and there was a huge balcony so it was nice.

I got really drunk somehow . . . and wandered off . . . and heard music in the distance . . .



. . . and found yet another crazy little weird place where bands were playing.  This was sort of like a store front — super super small — but a better
stage and sound
.  Again in the middle of nowhere — on a street with factories — a tiny
little door opened into a tiny little venue.




By the time I wandered back home there were a million hipsters just
hanging out outside my building.
  Just sitting on the side walk smoking and I guess trying to stay cool
(literally and figuratively).



There's a bar next door to my place and across the street but everyone was
outside.


I have to explore more I think . . .

THE GREAT OUTDOORS

Our third day at the ranch was the day of Elaine's and John's birthday, but there was lots to do before the celebration got underway.

First, the gang drove up to Gus's cabin for a picnic.  (Teddy actually rode her bike up to the cabin — a trek that would have taken me several days of hard slogging.)

The food was good, the day was fine, the company was congenial.

Ladies:

Then it was time for a float down the Green River, which runs by the main houses of the ranch.  That's the “big house”, Teddy's house, in the picture below.  The structure to the left of it is the bunkhouse.  The moose are often seen sneaking down to the river for a drink.


                                                                                                                 [Photo by Corinne Chubb]

Boats and kayaks were driven upstream in a truck and launched there, so all the boaters had to do was float downstream.


                                                                                                                  [Photo by Corinne Chubb]

John brought along his fly rod and fished for trout but didn't catch anything.


                                                                                                                  [Photo by Corinne Chubb]

Halfway along the float we beached the boats on a sandy bank and some worked up the courage to swim in the icy stream.  I was not one of them.


                                                                                                                      [Photo by Cotty Chubb]

I remained, like a good boat, superficial, reluctant to get to the bottom of things.


                                                                                                              [Photo by Corinne Chubb]

A night of partying lay ahead, which would become the stuff of legend . . .

TWO PAINTINGS IN DISTANT PLACES

I traveled a thousand miles north to Wyoming this summer, but mardecortesbaja contributor Paul Zahl (see The Zahl File) and his wife Mary ranged even further afield, leading a religious-themed tour to Russia.  (Mary and Paul are personable folks, and Dr. Zahl is a widely respected scholar of religion, so they're much in demand for such tours.)  Paul was kind enough to send some reports of his adventures, of which this is the first:

EL GRECO IN THE TWILIGHT ZONE

by Paul Zahl


In the movie Russian Ark there is a scene in which an
aristocratic French visitor to The Hermitage Museum at St. Petersburg
lectures a young Russian of the early Nineteenth Century concerning a
painting by El Greco
(above.)  So moved is the Marquis by this painting that he
kneels in adoration before it.  He explains to the young Russian that
the picture bears the image of the founders of Christianity, St. Peter
and St. Paul.  The scene in
Russian Ark is moving and
beautiful.



Last month, my wife and I took a group to see the very
painting in person.  It is in a room full of El Grecos, but it stands
out for its warmth and the humility of one of the figures.  The picture
also tells a story familiar to many: the tension between humility and
grace, represented by El Greco's depiction of St. Peter; and doctrine
and the authority of  the truth, represented by St. Paul. 

The picture was painted by El Greco between 1587 and 1592.  St.
Peter is on the left, an old and humbled man of soft features and
tenderness.  You could approach him and tell him almost anything about
yourself.  He is somewhat sad, sympathetic, and modest.  The observer
has to look very carefully to notice that Peter is carrying the key to
the kingdom in his left hand. But that is in shadow, almost obscured.

St. Paul, on the other hand, while not arrogant, is a person
possessed of his Idea.  With his left hand, his left fore-knuckle
actually, he directs our attention to the Word, the Bible before him.
 With his right hand, Paul reasons.  His features are ascetic,
convinced, sincere, a little detached from persons, but
possessed of
his Idea.



El Greco observes these two great men — I thought of
Rossellini's television movie entitled
The Acts of the Apostles (above),
which treats the same men in somewhat the same way — as two sides of
one thing, the Christian faith.  There is even a kind of yellow barrier
between them in the painting, emphasizing their difference.

My wife immediately noticed the doctrinal character of the St.
Paul, his cerebral, reasoning attitude.  It is unmistakable.  He is
reasoning with the viewer, on the basis of a written text.  St. Peter,
on the other hand, is 'reasoning' with us on the basis of a shattered
wisdom, what Dostoevsky called the 'strongest instrument, the humility
of humbled love'.  (I know it is pretentious to quote Dostoevsky, but
his words are apt just the same.)  

There are few visitors today to this painting by El Greco who do
not identify with Peter at the expense of Paul.

But wait, There's something else:



A week later, Mary and I were in the National Gallery of
Stockholm, and there it was (good God!) — the same painting, by the same
artist, in a room also full of El Grecos.  But it was different.  The
painting had the same subject, composed the same way, with the same
colors, but something was . . . well,  wildly different.

Something had happened to St. Paul.  He had lost weight, his
features were pinched, and his hair . . . it was a mess.  It was uncombed — what little there was of it was all
over the place.

What came to my mind was the episode of Thriller,
the old Boris Karloff television series, entitled “The Cheaters”.  At
the end of the episode, a selfish man begins to see himself, through
cursed spectacles, as he really is.  The makeup artist, Jack Barron,
first shows the man losing his hair and looking himself but bewildered.
 Then we see the man grinning diabolically, with hideous scars on his
face and just a few tufts of hair.  Finally, we see the man become a
sort of demon from hell, to which he is soon dragged by the very devil
himself.  Fun little episode for schoolboys on a Monday night at nine
way back then.


The comparison seems right, however.  What has happened to St.
Paul?  His convinced, convicted authority in the Hermitage
version has become transformed into a sort of 'wild man',
'I-just-came-out-of-the-forest-with-Robinson-Crusoe' persona.  The
Apostle has entered the Twilight Zone but hasn't come back.  Or he is
like the character in a Stephen King story, who is awakened too soon
from a forty-billion-mile journey to a distant planet.  Everything's
right but everything's wrong.

I have looked up the Stockholm version of “St. Peter and St.
Paul” and found nothing on this weird difference.  I can't believe it
has gone unnoticed.  But it is disturbing.

A final thought on El Greco's two St. Pauls.  The kind of
doctrinal Christianity embodied by the Hermitage Paul, text-weighted
and cerebral, is superannuated.  You see it today and you run.  The
painter seems to have understood this instinctively.  His later St.
Paul has sort of gone crazy.  “Grandfather, we need to get you to the
hospital.”  This Paul is not Diogenes, an old man of self-contained
de-constructing wisdom.  He is a street-crazy — maybe inspired, like the
homeless man in
Ordet, who has faith enough to raise the dead,
but you wouldn't take your child to him for a blessing.

Or, maybe he
is “The Howling Man”, of The Twilight Zone (above), who is in fact no longer
benign at all.


I don't know which of these two possibilities is the Stockholm
St. Paul.  But if the Stockholm Paul is the confessional Protestant of the two,
St. Peter is looking pretty good by comparison.  And wasn't Senator Kennedy a good
advertisement for
that side of the enterprise?

[Editor's Note: Paul has elaborated Mary's insight about the portrait of St. Paul into a very provocative meditation.  St. Paul wrote some of the greatest and most radical spiritual treatises of
all time, and they were a cry from the heart against law as a spiritual tool — but what he wrote was still theology, and all theology seems to have a
tendency to decompose into law, to be parsed for “rules” which can be
used to oppress instead of bless.  A spooky thought occurred to me while reading Paul Zahl's piece — maybe the Stockholm portrait of St. Paul was once an exact copy of the
one in the Hermitage and has decomposed over time, like the portrait of
Dorian Gray, reflecting the historical misuse of St. Paul's letters.  The
Twilight Zone, indeed!]

A MUSICAL FEAST

On our second night at the ranch, Elaine and John provided an awesome catered dinner at their house for the assembled multitudes.  (The assembling hadn't finished yet, either — there were more family members and local friends still to come.)  Afterwards, the musicians set up in the big living room for some equally awesome entertainment.  David Horgan got his pedal-steel going, adding immeasurably to the ensemble.


                                                                                                                                  [Photo by Eli Dokson]

Cotty, with crucial technical assistance from his daughter Corinne and John's son Will, had managed to mike the guys in order to record the proceedings on GarageBand, so I can share one of the performances with you:

“Dance”

This is J. B.'s new country waltz, played earlier at the hootenanny in Jackson and tailor-made for a pedal-steel accompaniment.  The lads join in sweetly with back-up vocals.  This is music that sounds like music, made by real people in a real place.  In this day and age, you can forget what that sounds like.

THE CAST OF CHARACTERS: DAVID

The crowd of friends assembled from around the nation to celebrate John's birthday was completed with the arrival of David Horgan, from Missoula, Montana.  Of all the musicians who met up and started playing with each other at Stanford, only David has made music his career, becoming in the process a world-class guitarist.  (He dashed off from the Wyoming gathering for a gig with Huey Lewis.)

David plays in a couple of bands in Missoula, including a salsa group and his flagship emsemble, The Big Sky Mudflaps.  He specializes in country swing, and brought his pedal-steel guitar to Wyoming, adding ethereal licks to the group's numbers.  The Mudflaps have recorded several CDs, which you can find here . . . and here's a link to a CD by Salsa Loca, the Latin band David plays in.  Reviewers tend to agree that it's ¡muy caliente!